Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/vulture-neil-gaiman-is-suing-accuser-caroline-wallmer-for-500k-claims-she-breached-nda.1169511/#post-138833112

Kalentan wrote:A fucking NDA?
Yes, exactly.
Reply
I don't get why a person of Nepenthe's age would choose to settle her global philosophy in the mid 80's.  Things like the cold war ending and greater globalization and interconnectedness don't fit in with her model of the world so she just pretends views and paradigms never developed past 1985. 

It's like being really interested in atomic physics but never studying anything that happened after 1915.  And now you go around talking about how crazy electrons are but not yet knowing that protons and neutrons are separate things and not just a big jello mold. 

[Image: thomsons-atomic-model.png]
Reply
(10 hours ago)ClothedMac wrote: I don't get why a person of Nepenthe's age would choose to settle her global philosophy in the mid 80's.  Things like the cold war ending and greater globalization and interconnectedness don't fit in with her model of the world so she just pretends views and paradigms never developed past 1985. 

It's like being really interested in atomic physics but never studying anything that happened after 1915.  And now you go around talking about how crazy electrons are but not yet knowing that protons and neutrons are separate things and not just a big jello mold. 

[Image: thomsons-atomic-model.png]

Watermelon model? That's racist
Banplz
Reply
Love that Peach ass. I'd eat it like some man pussy.
Reply
(10 hours ago)ClothedMac wrote: I don't get why a person of Nepenthe's age would choose to settle her global philosophy in the mid 80's.  Things like the cold war ending and greater globalization and interconnectedness don't fit in with her model of the world so she just pretends views and paradigms never developed past 1985. 
I think it's seriously because she's read like one book and just repeats from what she remembers off reading that plus "correct thought" in her online circles. The only thing I can ever remember her recommending to people to read to learn was an essay from like the 1970's from some Black Marxist woman. I think it was from a collection, maybe I can dig it up. (She didn't understand it correctly.)

One reason I'm fairly confident this is true? If you remember after the Israeli false flag to kick off the genocide, she made a big deal and multiple posts about how she was going to dig into Zionism and how y'all weren't doing the work. I think she started https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Judenstaat (from 1896) because she named dropped how she was "reading through" Herzl a few times but never mentioned finishing it. It's not even 200 pages long.
Reply
(11 hours ago)Propagandhim wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/i%E2%80%99m-really-curious-how-humanity-looks-in-500-years.1169118/

Nepenthe wrote:This pessimism is why people don't find liberalism appealing. Not even the worst climate predictions say that humanity will go totally extinct.

I'm also tired of this "we" business when it comes to the issues of today. The capitalism fueling colonialism, war, and climate change is not all of humanity's fault; it's largely the US and Western Europe's fault.


BossAttack wrote:Eh, it all depends on how much we fuck ourselves in the near future or if we solve our issues and keep advancing computing technology. In 500 years, we could manage to create a fully functional AI and have mastered the means of uploading our consciousness into computer hardware. At that point, "humanity" could begin to look VERY different.

Um....sweaty, sweat, sweat, sweaty....it's not "we" that's solving issues and advancing computing technology...

She's such tankie trash, spewing Russian propaganda at a rate Oliver Stone would bow to
Reply
I couldn't turn up where she posted that essay but I only looked for a couple minutes. But I did find this hilarious exchange from last week: https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump-and-el-salvadors-president-confirm-they-will-ignore-supreme-court-and-not-return-kilmar-%C3%81brego-garc%C3%ADa.1163862/page-8#post-138525873
Nepenthe wrote:
Bengraven wrote:I completely understand that. It's becoming worse now, too, with the weekly escalation of horrors. We're at the point where things that people are desensitized to the horrors he did weeks ago. We're just raising bars on acceptance.

But I'd rather we do something now, before people keep slowly becoming complacent. I feel like "it's been like this" isn't helpful. Especially when it feels like people from different groups pointing fingers like "you enabled this", "you should have taken this more seriously", "you should have done more". It's 100% right, but it's not going to help us move forward, just divide us more. And for what? Just to feel like "told you so"?

I don't know what to do, I'm just a random piece of shit who is like "can someone help us, I'm ready to go, where am I needed..."
We cannot start to do anything until people understand that these new problems are just continuations of old problems, that the algebra hasn't changed just because the letter of the unknown variable has, or because the operations are in a different order, or because there's more numbers than last time.

To solve a problem you must come to understand the whole of the problem, and then you must further analyze and investigate in order to find and apply the solution. How can you understand the problem of fascism if merely saying that the elements of it already existing and being applied to certain segments of the population annoys you? How can you understand the problem of fascism if saying that the permissive social behavior that allows fascists leeway to make in-roads is divisive?

This is just ego talking. Your personal annoyance adds nothing to the potential discussion of solving the problem of fascism. Indeed, one could say it's another qualitative characteristic of the problem- that a meaningless commitment to unity without actually, in turn, solving the problem of disunity is just useless liberalism.

Everyone has a lot of work to do, and it can start with naming America herself as what it is and always has been- a capitalist, white supremacist, settler colonial state that is happy to react to economic impotence, social division, and the potential of burgeoning class consciousness with fascist crackdowns and dismantlement of social protections. That is the problem.
Nepenthe wrote:
Quote:And then what? I'm not sure what you're actually advocating for beyond everyone becoming as smart as you.
I want people to become smarter than me because I don't have all of the knowledge myself needed to formally prescribe solutions to this problem. I can however say I can see and better define the problem than people who are not taking historical perspective into account and acting like America was some wonderful shining beacon of democracy that is getting dismantled because "bad people" elected the "wrong individuals."

But yes, I want people to actually read books, and study those books. I want people to learn how to employ critical thinking. I want people to learn how to employ good questioning and investigative practices. I want people to learn from other peoples and countries, and their histories, instead of leaning into nationalistic propaganda and orientalism. I want people to grow their imagination to even begin to imagine life outside of the purview of our political system. I want people to learn how to organize and create projects that address community needs. I want people to treat politics like they treat the lore of whatever pop culture phenomenon they're really into.

America will not have a revolution to overthrow the systems that create fascism because the population fundamentally is not educated enough about the state of the world and the state of themselves to even understand basics like how the damn prison system works. Americans basically know nothing because they've been propagandized and pacified into knowing nothing, and have thus become anti-intellectual. And by knowing nothing, you cannot even define the problem.

Education is step one of all of this.
Nepenthe wrote:
Bengraven wrote:I can completely understand where you're coming from I respect it, and as much as I have tried to be better myself I know that I'm not as good as I should be.

But I'm just like "what can we do right now?" because I'm not sure I can wait for people to figure out how to stop Donald Trump by researching the fascist history of America. I feel like the people empower and the people who have the ability to start meaningful movement should already have done that research and if they have it, we're just fucked.
First thing is to change your thinking. If you think you're fucked, you're not going to act in any way other than being fucked. If you are waiting for other, smarter people to start, then you are abdicating power and responsibility without understanding that those people did not start out smart and capable; they had to build themselves up, just like you have to now.

Second is to make it a habit to stop engaging in reactionary and terminally-online behaviors because these waste time and break your spirit. You should not spend hours of time doomscrolling or even engaging in conservative and chud fuckery. Your lifespan is limited. Imagine everything you could accomplish if time spent gawking at assholes online was spent reading books from actual historians instead, or hell just learning a new skill or hobby for personal growth.

Be conscious of this algorithmic hamster wheel; ask yourself why you are reading or watching YouTube videos from and about conservative commentators who don't matter. If you come across something that offends you, or even something you really agree with, investigate: who is the author, what is their job, what are their biases, who pays them, etc.

Ask yourself if you emotionally feel good about what you're engaging with online; if the answer is no, then stop, take a break, and move on. Curate your feeds when stupid shit pops up. Hell, spend less time online in general (go for a walk or drive around your community and see all the shit you didn't know was there; it'll blow your mind), and what time you do spend online, make sure it's productive. For example, if you're watching a tutorial about something, make sure you're actually following along and doing the thing! Make and create stuff!

Third is to read more non-social media content; historical and philosophical books, research papers, investigative reports, etc.. Not just to read these things, but to actually study them. Read it again. Take notes. Look up difficult or unknown concepts, secondary material, and analyses and rebuttals. Make sure you can actually regurgitate the points and material if asked. It sucks at first if you aren't a habitual reader, but it gets better over time. Reading with the intent to study and learn is important because it not only rewires you to not be so reactionary and social media-brained, where you crave instant gratification all the time, but you're developing and strengthing critical thinking skills necessary to sift through propaganda and misinformation. This will be especially important in a post-AI world.

Fourth is to build resistance and organizational habits and skills. Go volunteer (for anything, it doesn't matter what at this stage.) Find and participate in meetings from existing antifascist or anti-capitalist organizations. Go to protests. Ask your neighbors if they want to be in touch. Just pick up trash around your neighborhood.

The point of these things is not to immediately save the world. The point is to build you into a reliable citizen participating in the betterment of your society and humankind. The more you do this, the more you will find what your passion and niche is within the greater struggle. Maybe you really like doing supply delivery. Maybe you find you're a good teacher. Maybe you have organizational skills you didn't know you had.

Again, America is starting from Level 0. We have been pacified and robbed of education and community. We must recognize this and begin to start clawing back our minds and autonomy. Only then can we actually move on to subsequent levels.

Three days later she told people to watch TikTok instead of reading books because books are capitalist propaganda:
(04-18-2025, 12:20 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/fatima-houssana-and-9-of-her-family-members-murdered-24-hours-after-film-accepted-in-cannes-festival.1167453/#post-138677715
Nepenthe wrote:I was discussing this earlier, but one of the few upsides of the modern internet is the amount of recording, cataloguing, and direct participation within political and cultural discourse that happens is unprecedented in human history, and narratives are harder to take root without willful ignorance or malice at play. Capitalists and their pet politicians cannot just write convenient history books that rely on the passage of time and propagandization to whitewash their crimes when the far more entertaining TikTok is there showcasing the truth in 4K. I am genuinely curious to see, even in 10-15 years, what a historical look-back on Gaza is going to look like. "I was there." "I marched." "I was against this." You sure about that? Where's the proof? Oh, you were actually on a video game forum telling people to ignore Gaza during the election season? Hmm.

And here's a post from 2022 that really says it all:
Nepenthe, https://www.resetera.com/threads/%E2%80%9Cfuck-capitalism%E2%80%9D-ok-cool-i-agree-too-but-what-are-the-legitimate-alternatives-that-wouldn%E2%80%99t-ruin-the-world-more-than-it-already-is.655698/page-13#post-96795699 wrote:Well again, one of the problems I have with socialism is like you said- it's basically capitalism without capitalists. Most people are beholden to growthism and the idea that we need to produce just to produce, so I don't think you're going to get a lot of socialist fantasy that is significantly different from stories of a capitalistic status quo. I also did agree that leftist needs to get better at storytelling and plain language, and allow ourselves to be imaginative rather than sticking within circles that espouse theory as jargon. I actually did start briefly making a personal kind of world-building document for myself about what I would imagine a "post capitalist" society to be, both to have some sort of idea to pitch to people and work towards tangibly in the real world, and as a vehicle to read and learn more about alternative ways and philosophies of living. In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s in that it is primarily communal. My basic ideas were as follows:

You don't have a menial job to go to at a certain time anymore, working for a boss, although you are expected to reasonably pitch in towards the maintenance of the utilities and resources you want to access within your community. Ex. You take from a public garden then you better make sure you're putting back what you took for the next person who comes along somehow, either through time spent cultivating it or providing resources for its maintenance. Libraries of the commons would also be a more fundamental public service where you can have access to the tools and items you may need without having to necessarily go and buy them; people donate usable but unwanted "things" (cookware, furniture, lawn equipment, clothing, etc.) and you rent this like you would a book at a library, and bring it back when you're done. Art and culture would still be valuable pursuits too, and indeed, freer expressions of self and culture would be encouraged: city and park demonstrations, more volunteer upkeep of buildings, more public paintings and graffiti, street music, etc. People should be encouraged to be creative and have fun with others. Housing would be more mixed; closer quarters where most amenities (bars and restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.) are within walking or biking distance. And so long as a spot or joint is free and fits your living needs, you can claim it as your home so long as you promise to abide by whatever community and/or local ordinances exist there. Political organization would be expressed through a consensus based form of representation. Everyone is encouraged to participate in local meetings to address grievances, and goals and demands are reached through discussion and consensus and delivered to a higher presiding body by a representative who is voted on by the chosen body. This representative would ideally not always be the same person to temper the inclination of power-tripping. Also, we're fucking off of fossil fuels permanently and our public transporation is robust and strong. Solarpunk reality baby.

I didn't write much more than that, but that was my starting idea for a little fantasy world. You wake up, get yourself together, and essentially go about your day however you choose without the threat of coercive labor forcing you to do shit you don't really want to do. You wanna hang at the local bar with your friends, take a trip into the wilderness, etc. then go for it. Be merry. If you wish to use a public service in society, get groceries and supplies, or anything else, it is simply mandated that you maintain and use it responsibly and return it back for the rest of the community to use too. It's not too horrible, is it?

Anyway:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump-and-el-salvadors-president-confirm-they-will-ignore-supreme-court-and-not-return-kilmar-%C3%81brego-garc%C3%ADa.1163862/page-10#post-138530973 wrote:And christ, we truly don't deserve Nepenthe.
Nah, you do.
Reply
Dead
Reply
Nope  Learn the theory
Oh yeah Regurgitate the Materials
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-last-of-us-hbo-series-season-2-game-spoiler-ot-too-good-to-be-gone-open-game-spoilers.1160046/page-53#post-138839460

Quote: Cop User banned (permanent): Hostility and inappropriate commentary. Multiple prior severe bans for the same.
Chris Metal wrote:
nonoriri wrote:yes because it's fun and flirty and shows that they have an adult sexual relationship and they aren't teens holding hands. Portraying WLW relationships as chaste to make them more palatable is a long standing issue. I get that you're frothing in in the mouth defending the show for some reason but maybe don't lecture a queer femme person about representation? Check yourself because you're being a tool.
Oh fuck off with the queer superiority complex, you don't know me. I will lecture you. State and attitude between two consenting adults in sexual relationships lesbian, straight, bi or otherwise doesn't need to be shown with drugs and sex. Check yourself. If you require drugs in your personal life to make your personal relationships fun and flirty and valid that's on you and is pathetic.
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/local-man-starts-substack-creates-ai-persona-with-chatgpt-to-help-run-company-then-hits-on-that-ai-generated-person.1169865/#post-138851340

Fat4all wrote:how should anyone be able to trust your horny stupid ass again
Thinking
Reply
The details or directions never matter for Nepenthe.  Swap them out, change them, give ones that are incompatible or contradictory.  All that matters is that Nepenthe is the most intelligent and the most informed one on the issues and that her actions are more important and more beneficial than yours. 

It doesn't matter what it is. Whether it be for party, country or Yahweh.  She's doing more than you are and she's smarter so listen to her.
Reply
(11 hours ago)benji wrote:
(11 hours ago)imsotired wrote: Nep is a few decades behind on where global emissions are coming from.  I guess they didn't cover that on tiktok.
 Divest from capitalism, colonialism, and white supremacy!
In another thread she said US/EU emissions are increasing and that's why we're projected to hit +3 C degrees. Neither of these are true. The UN projection for 2100 is like 0.4 C now or something. lol

Without knowing for sure, I'd take a wild guess that it's because China is decarbonising its economy faster than anticipated while still being the biggest net carbon emitter in history.
2 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
Nepenthe’s Utopia sounds less communist and more like a bohemian wet dream. 

“I don’t want to be forced to work but I will have easy access to restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, etc.”

Feels more like she doesn’t want to work at all, her idea of “giving back to the community” is so fucking vague that may be “drawing furry porn”.
Reply
(Yesterday, 08:08 PM)killamajig wrote: [Image: RNv9q9x.jpg]

omfg

Someone needs to put bufbat on a watch list

He's a fuckin brony, he's been on lists for years.
Reply
(7 hours ago)Boredfrom wrote: Nepenthe’s Utopia sounds less communist and more like a bohemian wet dream. 

“I don’t want to be forced to work but I will have easy access to restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, etc.”

Feels more like she doesn’t want to work at all, her idea of “giving back to the community” is so fucking vague that may be “drawing furry porn”.

Nepenthe wants to be landed gentry with slaves doing all the work and waiting on her hand and foot so she can draw furry art and lecture people on Era.
Reply
Nepenthe doesn't have to work.  She's retired, she already did all the work.  Like she said:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/where-do-you-see-the-democrat-party-moving-to.1028583/page-26 wrote:First of all, we built this bitch and yet own none of it. That right there is a scam of the highest order and should make any Black person swear off this goddamn country.


Her only job is to collect the late paycheck owed to her for her building this bitch.  Note the correct use of "we" in this post - Nepenthe did the work.  She was in the fields.  As opposed to the "we" that groups the global South in the US and Europe's capitalist transgressions.
Reply
If you're an adult and you're seriously discussing the character design of a Mario Kart character they should throw your ass in that Salvadoran prison.
Reply
(7 hours ago)Boredfrom wrote: Nepenthe’s Utopia sounds less communist and more like a bohemian wet dream. 

“I don’t want to be forced to work but I will have easy access to restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, etc.”

Feels more like she doesn’t want to work at all, her idea of “giving back to the community” is so fucking vague that may be “drawing furry porn”.
She's never asked the simplest question about her central premise: "where does the stuff come from?"

Think about it, where does Nepenthe, the furry artist, get the means to replace or supply the maintenance for the carrot she takes? She doesn't care even though she asserts:
Nepenthe wrote:You don't have a menial job to go to at a certain time anymore, working for a boss, although you are expected to reasonably pitch in towards the maintenance of the utilities and resources you want to access within your community. Ex. You take from a public garden then you better make sure you're putting back what you took for the next person who comes along somehow, either through time spent cultivating it or providing resources for its maintenance.
You have to supply the "utilities and resources" even if you're completely incapable. And I don't mean that you can't work (will she force Shreds to?), I mean that like literally I couldn't supply medical resources or electricity to the community. I can supply money because that facilitates the trade among those who can supply those things. But Nepenthe demands no trade in her system, that's capitalism.

Like Marx, she's getting rid of the thing that facilitates everything then trying to recreate it from scratch with some kind of ledger of everything you've ever done in your life. That the community has to monitor and force you to make good on.

She doesn't realize the next part of her "story" either has the same issue of supply:
Nepenthe wrote:Libraries of the commons would also be a more fundamental public service where you can have access to the tools and items you may need without having to necessarily go and buy them; people donate usable but unwanted "things" (cookware, furniture, lawn equipment, clothing, etc.) and you rent this like you would a book at a library, and bring it back when you're done.
Why assume the supply of things will match what people don't want instead of just being junk? Why allow "property" at all instead of just having a community supply of things? What happens if somebody doesn't bring it back? Or monopolizes it? Sure that might be them being greedy, but what if they're the best cook? Can I demand return of the cookware even though this harms the entire community if I cook instead of them? What if I want to use it to make what I want but he won't make? Look at the endless series of questions that need to be answered. Constantly. For everyone.

Btw, like all her suggestions over the years, these exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_things

She suggests property exists too in the next part:
Nepenthe wrote:Housing would be more mixed; closer quarters where most amenities (bars and restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.) are within walking or biking distance. And so long as a spot or joint is free and fits your living needs, you can claim it as your home so long as you promise to abide by whatever community and/or local ordinances exist there.
Shouldn't "free" and "fits your living needs" and "claim it as your home" all be decided by the community? What about the amenities that aren't located within walking distance? What about factories or power plants or chemical plants? They simply don't exist, but yet the bars and restaurants and pharmacies are all supplied somehow. Even though all of those things have to take from the collective resources and somehow return them. So a bar has to both use and produce alcohol. That pharmacy has to supply medicine back to the community in equivalents to what it takes, so it needs its own supply of medicine? She says the "resources" but what resources? Can these places charge money? If they can charge money and trade what's the purpose of the collective storehouse and ledger? We're already back to capitalism with both trade and property?

But, oh, don't worry, she's "solved" all these questions too:
Nepenthe wrote:Political organization would be expressed through a consensus based form of representation. Everyone is encouraged to participate in local meetings to address grievances, and goals and demands are reached through discussion and consensus and delivered to a higher presiding body by a representative who is voted on by the chosen body.
This is literally gibberish. It's not a complete thought. What does "higher presiding body and chosen body" even mean? Why is there even a higher presiding body? To do what? Can it reject the consensus of the community? Then why even do all that? What happens when there's no consensus? If we need consensus then why can someone just take from the community storehouse? Why can someone take from the library of things? What if the consensus is that no, you don't need to take a carrot? Her decision making system has piled even more questions on top of our earlier questions.

Nepenthe wrote:You wake up, get yourself together, and essentially go about your day however you choose without the threat of coercive labor forcing you to do shit you don't really want to do. You wanna hang at the local bar with your friends, take a trip into the wilderness, etc. then go for it. Be merry. If you wish to use a public service in society, get groceries and supplies, or anything else, it is simply mandated that you maintain and use it responsibly and return it back for the rest of the community to use too. It's not too horrible, is it?
She doesn't even realize this is a threat of coercive labor. If you don't return to the community, they're obviously going to force you to. She doesn't say this either because she knows she has to either go with mass policing or she's simply too stupid to realize she needs mass policing for this. Based on her other posts about policing, I believe it's the latter. She imagines it's possible for everyone to just do whatever they want, take whatever they want and this to all somehow "balance" out in making sure the supply of everything is completely maintained exactly as global capitalism does now. That somehow the manna will continue to provide because that's just what happens.

In other words, like she said:
Nepenthe wrote:In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s
Reply
(6 hours ago)benji wrote: In other words, like she said:
Nepenthe wrote:In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s

The Smurf economic theory.
Reply
Instead of engaging with the world and acquiring the skills needed to build her own decent life, Nepenthe retreats into these elaborate fantasies of societal control.   What kind of fucked up mind spends time pining for a system to forcibly dictate the lives of millions, rather than simply taking personal responsibility.   Unworkable systems demanding the forced participation of entire populations – conveniently ignoring the jackboot required to enforce it on those who refuse.  Put in the effort to become a productive individual for once in your life.  Reshaping the world by fiat because she can't be bothered to navigate it personally...  "Guys you won't be forced to do shit you don't really want to do!"  Uh, I kinda like what I do for a living.  I don't mind it.   Being forced to live in a society where nobody can figure out how anything gets made is doing shit I don't really want to do.



Also, side note: There's a disconnect between the historical weight and implied struggle in the phrase, "We built this bitch" (a struggle she adopts as her own) of African Americans and the almost childishly simplistic, frictionless world she imagines. I thought that phrase had power because it spoke to hard realities and struggle of forcible labor and the tangible creation of infrastructure and wealth. But her utopia, in contrast, feels like it's floating free from those hard realities of production, maintenance, and resource management that building anything actually requires.  She's like a spoiled child that doesn't know how anything works, but feels entitled to it because the adults dote on her and take care of her.  The fucking entitlement of constantly invoking her victim complex to explain away everything created this mind.
Reply
(6 hours ago)Propagandhim wrote: Instead of engaging with the world and acquiring the skills needed to build her own decent life, Nepenthe retreats into these elaborate fantasies of societal control.  What kind of fucked up mind spends time pining for a system to forcibly dictate the lives of millions, rather than simply taking personal responsibility.  Unworkable systems demanding the forced participation of entire populations – conveniently ignoring the jackboot required to enforce it on those who refuse.  Put in the effort to become a productive individual for once in your life.  Reshaping the world by fiat because she can't be bothered to navigate it personally...  "Guys you won't be forced to do shit you don't really want to do!"  Uh, I kinda like what I do for a living.  I don't mind it.  Being forced to live in a society where nobody can figure out how anything gets made is doing shit I don't really want to do.



Also, side note: There's a disconnect between the historical weight and implied struggle in the phrase, "We built this bitch" (a struggle she adopts as her own) of African Americans and the almost childishly simplistic, frictionless world she imagines. I thought that phrase had power because it spoke to hard realities and struggle of forcible labor and the tangible creation of infrastructure and wealth. But her utopia, in contrast, feels like it's floating free from those hard realities of production, maintenance, and resource management that building anything actually requires.  She's like a spoiled child that doesn't know how anything works, but feels entitled to it because the adults dote on her and take care of her.  The fucking entitlement of constantly invoking her victim complex to explain away everything created this mind.


Jesus, what kind of freak spends this much time analyzing some internet idiot so obsessively.....  



Ethan Klein haters are something else.
Reply
How are they going to determine how long people can borrow lawn chairs for?  Can someone keep the chair all summer before returning it to the community library in the winter when no one wants it as long as they use it everyday?

Are they going to tear down the mansions that are already built, or do the best mansions belong to whoever "calls dibs" first, or are the best mansions going to be assigned based on victim points?
4 users liked this post: killamajig, MJBarret, Taco Bell Tower, Propagandhim
Reply
(6 hours ago)Hap Shaughnessy wrote:
(6 hours ago)benji wrote: In other words, like she said:
Nepenthe wrote:In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s

The Smurf economic theory.

Papa Smurf was still giving everyone orders, thought.
Reply
Nepenthe is Brainy Smurf.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower
Reply
did nepenthe ever make that fursuit she was comissioned for???  ??? ??? ???
Reply
(5 hours ago)Greatness Gone wrote: did nepenthe ever make that fursuit she was comissioned for???  ??? ??? ???

I don't think so but from what we learned the person who commissioned NepNep spotted her at some con or something.  The person and their friends cornered NepNep and made her refund the person, partially anyway  lol
2 users liked this post: killamajig, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
(5 hours ago)Greatness Gone wrote: did nepenthe ever make that fursuit she was comissioned for???  ??? ??? ???

Community consensus was that fursuits were no longer needed by the community, so she didn't need to make it.
3 users liked this post: MJBarret, killamajig, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
Nep is Plagiarizing Things She Barely Understands Smurf
3 users liked this post: killamajig, almostheathen, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
Quote:Real disgusting levels of transphobia. I'm guessing they want trans men to go into the women's toilet too now?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/uk-supreme-court-rules-that-sex-is-binary-based-solely-on-biology-and-that-trans-women-do-not-come-within-the-definition-of-a-woman%E2%80%9D.1165536/page-8#post-138868491

Queen Bee wrote:Hidden content

Got this reply

Quote:Wishing all the best of luck. Hoping with everything I've got that you're dealing with folks that possess actual human empathy instead of hateful zombies

Also Queen Bee

Quote:Defining a woman strictly by her biology and acceptance in society by a narrow view of what women should look like, somehow heralded as a win for feminism. Idiotic country.

Quote:god, fucking hate how Transphobic this country is.

None of this should have gotten to the Supreme Court, wish Rowling would just piss off to Mars on a rocket with Elon Musk.

You pushed for this so hard it had to end up somewhere to get some sense restored
2 users liked this post: malfoyking, killamajig
Reply


Forum Jump: