Poll: Do you want Elon babies?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
33.33%
3 33.33%
no
66.67%
6 66.67%
Total 9 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Elon Musk thread - Saviour of the Black Sea Fleet #SpaceKaren
#91

Hesright
3 users liked this post: BIONIC, Uncle, Gameboy Nostalgia
Like Reply
#92
(12-09-2023, 04:49 AM)benji wrote:
Hesright

based.
Like Reply
#93
1 user liked this post: Nintex
Like Reply
#94





Stop complicating my overly simple worldview with your history and facts. Social Justice Warrior
1 user liked this post: Potato
Like Reply
#95
(12-09-2023, 08:49 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:

isn't far left generally considered to be the top left corner (and far right the top right corner) of that square? which would make chatgpt slightly more far left than grok

  Elon
Like Reply
#96
Elon Musk would've voted against Apartheid very publicly to be able to be the only white guy to hang out with the 'cool' blacks, everybody knows it Trumps
Like Reply
#97
(12-23-2023, 10:50 AM)Nintex wrote: Elon Musk would've voted against Apartheid very publicly to be able to be the only white guy to hang out with the 'cool' blacks, everybody knows it Trumps

what everybody knows is that the english voted against apartheid while the dutchies voted for apartheid  ufup
Like Reply
#98


Elon
Like Reply
#99




Elon Musk is in Auschwitz with Ben Shapiro
Like Reply
[Image: GFvjMjsXoAAT5VO?format=jpg]
Like Reply
1 user liked this post: Nintex
Like Reply


1st reply?  lol
Like Reply
Like Reply
@BadLegalTakes
[Image: GSs9JkWWAAEy5Oz?format=jpg&name=small]
Like Reply

Hell yeah

We need this feature on the Bire.
Like Reply

Dead Dead Dead Dead
Like Reply
Like Reply
How did I miss this?

Dead
2 users liked this post: TylenolJones, Nintex
Like Reply
omfg
Like Reply
4 users liked this post: chronovore, who is ted danson?, benji, Nintex
Like Reply
Way too much hand movement. Waaay too much. How did that make it to final cut without someone telling her to just keep her hands by her side?
1 user liked this post: chronovore
Like Reply
It's really unnatural and unnerving. 

That edit is great.
Like Reply
[Image: HnkGy5f.png]

salty musk salty his aryan queen doesn't look his way.
Like Reply
[Image: GX5KRn7XsAEFrbc?format=png&name=small]
Like Reply
So, one question I have is, when Elon first took over he fired a bunch of engineers and a while heap of other people who seemed to be working on making Twatter a safe space for the freak squad. Has anyone really noticed a difference (aside from the freak squad)?

I remember people saying the whole site would fall over in a few months. This obviously hasn't happened, but has there been other issues or was there just a whole bunch of people doing not much at old Twatter?
1 user liked this post: Uncle
Like Reply
did you get into the chopin?
Like Reply
It created a bigger difference in the tech space and it was mostly a self-inflicted wound of people working for the corpo tech companies.

When it happened a lot of tech folks started saying things like: "You can't keep servers online with just 2 people", "you can't manage your product without a product owner for every region", "watch it go down in 48 hours if they no longer have the GDPR compliance officer", "Good luck hiring folks without an inclusive and diverse HR team!", "Everyone will leave if you don't allow WFH!" and things like that. A lot of industry standard processes are also designed to increase the size of teams with various roles that have little to do with actually well... doing anything. 

Managers and CEOs of other (tech) companies had the same assumptions based on what their teams told them and the TED talks and books they consumed. And the general idea among the rank and file was that if your company has 1000's of employees, as long as it still has $0.01 in the bank you have no right to fire anyone. In fact your boss has no right to "demand" anything from you. If you are "unwell" and don't do anything for a month or simply spend your time writing newsletters about gay rights in Kenya, well that's the problem of the company not you. After all you are a special snowflake that brings a lot of "value" to this company or they simply "owe" you. For years there was a "simple" solution to this problem of rising "costs", just increase the prices. But inflation has made that more difficult because even if you increase the price 10%, you still need to increase the price by another 10% to actually increase the margin and your customers facing higher costs will adjust their plans (everything is a subscription after all) to deal with their rising cost or stop using your product entirely.

X was the first big tech company that went back to "what do we actually need?" and figured out that they could cut a lot of the fat and that there are less demanding people willing to do the same job. So while the algorithm on X sometimes goes haywire and there are more bugs in general it still functions about 95% - 99% the same with 75% - 80% less costs. So a lot of companies are now following this example, mandating people to work from the office for starters and cutting back HR and support roles. After all, no HR means less "automatic" hiring. 

I think over the next 2 - 3 years and perhaps even sooner all the big tech companies will shrink their employee numbers by at least 50%. There is just no reason to have that many people on the payroll. A big headache for governments in the future because "tech" had sort of become a dumping ground for people that well, wouldn't/couldn't be hired anywhere else.
Like Reply
1 user liked this post: Nintex
Like Reply
if that was optimus, that would be a fantastic troll
Like Reply
remember when one photo of a guy sitting in a tank, or spelling potatoe, or a single passionate scream was enough to tank a political career
2 users liked this post: who is ted danson?, killamajig
Like Reply


Forum Jump: