5 hours ago
(6 hours ago)killamajig wrote:(6 hours ago)HaughtyFrank wrote:(Yesterday, 04:09 PM)Ethan wrote: They always bring up that dogshit Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport "study". It's literally the only study they have. And it's dogshit.
FFS:
[/list]
Quoting this from few pages back because, man, this is just so absurd. Like if I get this right aren't they basically saying that there isn't any reason for a women's sports category at all? That it's solely exclusion? How can you take any study about transgender athletes seriously when it poses that men don't have any physical advantages
It's that sexist line of thinking that women were not given the same opportunities as men to develop in sports. That's why they're weaker.
That's basically telling female athletes now, If they just trained harder they could compete with bio men.
I guess they were not given enough opportunities to open jar of pickles either?
It's weird considering patriarchy put them in the kitchen. You'd think they'd be better jar openers than men by now.
