Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)

[Propagandhim]

The law addresses safety concerns explicitly raised by women, not to antagonize or make people feel bad.   You're not the main character of the world.   It responds to a demand for protection rooted in feelings of insecurity based on reality.  Why a tiny minority of people refuse to consider the broader impact of infringing upon the rights of the larger group who are vocalizing their need for safety, is beyond me.  It originates from a place of protection, not malice. It exists because many women are expressing that they feel unsafe and need greater security - why does this mean nothing to them?  Only 19% of trans women claim to be exclusively attracted to men.  The reality is, women don't feel safe around biological men that have a high chance of being sexually aroused by them in their bathrooms, changing/locker rooms, battered womens' shelters, prisons, advocacy groups, transitional housing, college sororities, retreats, book clubs, the list is endless...to say nothing of the issues with their sports.    Is this a narcissistic personality disorder or do they really not understand where women are coming from?  Figure out how to present as the way you want without fucking over half of the planet, please.  Nobody has to fight with you about whether or not you're a chick, nor do you have to engage in that fight either, live how you want but also consider the security issues that women are voicing.  Both can be done at the same time -  there's no easy solution to this.   If you find it impossible to believe and feel like you're a woman while also being in male spaces, then maybe you don't actually truly believe it yourself?