Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[DavidCroquet]

We've reached full Team bloober redemption

https://www.resetera.com/threads/lttp-i-played-the-medium-and-its-not-at-all-the-harmful-evil-game-that-been-made-out-to-be-online-its-narratively-interesting-to-explore.1003311/

https://www.resetera.com/threads/lttp-i-played-the-medium-and-its-not-at-all-the-harmful-evil-game-that-been-made-out-to-be-online-its-narratively-interesting-to-explore.1003311/page-3#post-129931731

Yeah, if OP is going to misinterpret this, I'm not going to go along with their interpretations of this bobvids guy and apparently him calling the game "evil".

Someone let B-Dubs know he needs to purge the Master of Dossiers from the site...they're doxxing and endangering site members by digging through Deep Web Hate Sites (public Twitter posts).

EDIT: Apologies to visawife. It seems that Lord Fanny is the one who started all this with the tweets. And arguably Coffee, who first insinuated knowledge of these posts.

He's specially talking about Twitter, where the OP started this line of thought and largely was reacting to another person's take on the game (which is what the original post that user was quoting was saying, that it felt like this was a reaction to something else online and he was having a hard time following it). This thread is mostly repackaged discourse from Twitter the OP repackaged here while taking out the other part of the conversation

If I may be a gay retard for a moment, I think it's bizarre that evidence of a "hot" conversation elsewhere is even being presented as any kind of indicator of anything. 

If I start talking politics in a bar--or, even more ill-advisedly, on Twitter--and call someone a fucking idiot over a tax policy disagreement, would that mean I am permanently barred from discussing tax law in a more thoughtful way elsewhere?