Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)

[Hap Shaughnessy]

1. Since scarcity exists, this man not denying any specific case will mean the denial of others, as we cannot know that any one choice will not lead to the denial of more others we cannot argue that his personal intervention in any specific case would not lead to more suffering than the current reality. This eliminates his personal actions as a justification.

1. Denials are based on monetary reasons, not scarcity of materials.

3. We can also reject his complicity by "taking the position of CEO" because this would either justify the murder of every single person on Earth or mandate the denial of all persons insurance coverage.

3. The guy in charge is responsible. The rest doesn't follow.