(01-20-2025, 02:18 AM)Alpacx wrote: EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s Day One Executive Order on ‘Male and Female’
https://www.thefp.com/p/trumps-day-one-executive-order-male-female-gender-ideology-pronouns
Quote:Here is what the order sets out:
The Executive Order establishes Government-wide the biological reality of two sexes and clearly defines male and female.
All radical gender ideology guidance, communication, policies, and forms are removed.
Agencies will cease pretending that men can be women and women can be men when enforcing laws that protect against sex discrimination.
“Woman” means an “adult human female.”
The Executive Order directs that Government identification like passports and personnel records will reflect biological reality and not self-assessed gender identity.
The Executive Order ends the practice of housing men in women’s prisons and taxpayer funded “transition” for male prisoners.
The Executive Order ends the forced recitation of “preferred pronouns” and protects Americans’ First Amendment and statutory rights to recognize the biological and binary nature of sex.
This includes protection in the workplace and in federal funded entities like schools.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8349/c8349316210441bb7650fdab12e7250a6a8229d4" alt="Trumps Trumps"
Well, at least we got a tiny point of day one sanity before all the other nonsense comes in.
Great aesthetics on the indoor inauguration but it also looks kind of dystopian. Especially with Melania in that outfit.
Trump, cabinet, GOP and some guests in a heavily fortified capitol. Instead of a massive outdoor crowd of common people.
"THE DAWN OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF AMERICA"
1 user liked this post: Nintex
01-20-2025, 11:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2025, 11:50 PM by Nintex.)
![[Image: GhxgIV7W0AAJ7lb?format=jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhxgIV7W0AAJ7lb?format=jpg)
At least the next mayor of New York will have no problem bulldozing an orphanage to build a nuclear power plant to power the crypto mines
So strange seeing the growth of Barron. He was so shy before.
1 user liked this post: Nintex
01-21-2025, 12:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2025, 12:32 AM by Nintex.)
Trumps pastor just launched a crypto coin
what the fuck
01-21-2025, 02:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2025, 04:09 AM by Propagandhim.)
Looks like Trumpy lied about pardoning Ross Ulbricht "on day 1".
Nobody seems to care that this guy makes promises and doesn't ever keep his word. It's just expected that he's a liar. "Oh no, he's not going to tariff China 60%" Then why is he saying it? "Oh, he just talks. Words don't actually mean anything to him."
Edit: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1881524296386031892
Guess it's coming eventually
Killing time in a park and a (I suspect) uighur lady who maybe wasn’t all there comes up and thanked me for Trump. She requested that I personally ask Trump to stop China, like he stopped Israel. I might be on the hook for this. Although I engaged in some stolen valor because I didn’t have the heart to admit I didn’t vote for him.
Nintex, get me a direct line to Trump.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1881551195371897324?t=DD1e4ROiNmzaxybWaXdhCQ&s=19[/tweet]
"How is Kim Jun Un doing"
So we are going back on the Paris climate deal, we are going to be drilling for oil and gas again.
Fuck Trump so much.
Fuck him right up the fucking ass.
The owners of META,Tiktok and X at a presidential inauguration...
State run social media eh?
Pretty glad Trump released this guy, obviously a very innocent, nice stable person.
01-21-2025, 05:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2025, 05:14 PM by benji.)
(01-20-2025, 07:40 PM)Nintex wrote: Great aesthetics on the indoor inauguration but it also looks kind of dystopian. Especially with Melania in that outfit.
Trump, cabinet, GOP and some guests in a heavily fortified capitol. Instead of a massive outdoor crowd of common people. We have very different ideas of dystopia.
(01-21-2025, 10:08 AM)MMaRsu wrote: The owners of META,Tiktok and X at a presidential inauguration...
State run social media eh? Imagine falling for this kind of nonsense.
regarding this, only 33% of people with a favorable view of the democratic party
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/19/politics/democrats-party-change-cnn-poll/
it's pointless to speculate on the direction things will end up going, but this feels like a real problem as I bet half the people who want the democrats to change are annoyed that they don't represent the working man and get tied up in identity politics, what is a woman and all that, and the other half are mad that they don't run FURTHER left into crazytown
everyone thinks the change the party needs is something completely different from everyone else
1 user liked this post: Ethan
1 user liked this post: MMaRsu
(01-21-2025, 05:13 PM)benji wrote: (01-20-2025, 07:40 PM)Nintex wrote: Great aesthetics on the indoor inauguration but it also looks kind of dystopian. Especially with Melania in that outfit.
Trump, cabinet, GOP and some guests in a heavily fortified capitol. Instead of a massive outdoor crowd of common people. We have very different ideas of dystopia.
(01-21-2025, 10:08 AM)MMaRsu wrote: The owners of META,Tiktok and X at a presidential inauguration...
State run social media eh? Imagine falling for this kind of nonsense.
Which nonsense? Why were they at a presidential inauguration?
(01-21-2025, 05:37 PM)benji wrote:
(01-21-2025, 05:51 PM)MMaRsu wrote: (01-21-2025, 05:13 PM)benji wrote: (01-20-2025, 07:40 PM)Nintex wrote: Great aesthetics on the indoor inauguration but it also looks kind of dystopian. Especially with Melania in that outfit.
Trump, cabinet, GOP and some guests in a heavily fortified capitol. Instead of a massive outdoor crowd of common people. We have very different ideas of dystopia.
(01-21-2025, 10:08 AM)MMaRsu wrote: The owners of META,Tiktok and X at a presidential inauguration...
State run social media eh? Imagine falling for this kind of nonsense.
Which nonsense? Why were they at a presidential inauguration?
Because it's a rich guy type thing to do.
1 user liked this post: benji
(01-21-2025, 06:00 PM)killamajig wrote: (01-21-2025, 05:51 PM)MMaRsu wrote: (01-21-2025, 05:13 PM)benji wrote: We have very different ideas of dystopia.
Imagine falling for this kind of nonsense.
Which nonsense? Why were they at a presidential inauguration?
Because it's a rich guy type thing to do.
Were they at Bidens inauguration as well? Or Barack's?
01-21-2025, 06:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2025, 06:30 PM by benji.)
(01-21-2025, 05:51 PM)MMaRsu wrote: Which nonsense? Why were they at a presidential inauguration? (01-21-2025, 06:15 PM)MMaRsu wrote: Were they at Bidens inauguration as well? Or Barack's? Biden's inauguration was tiny because of COVID. Did Obama bother to invite Zuck in 2012? That would have been the only one he might have because Twitter was tiny and TikTok didn't exist yet.
Inviting rich dudes to public events does not make anything "state-run" and it's absurd to believe that's the case. It's especially absurd because "state-run" social media would not be able to ban anyone so the American state is not going to try and run them for this very reason. That's why the Biden Admin just leaned on Facebook and Twitter to ban people for questioning COVID policies rather than try to run the things.
Another way it's absurd is that you cannot even explain to me what you think this means. What would "state-run" Instagram or Twitter even look like? You think Zuck and Elon are going to destroy their ad revenue and the platforms themselves by banning any criticism of the American government? Come on. Elon himself spends practically everyday bitching about the government.
1 user liked this post: Alpacx
(01-21-2025, 09:02 AM)MMaRsu wrote: So we are going back on the Paris climate deal, we are going to be drilling for oil and gas again.
Fuck Trump so much.
Fuck him right up the fucking ass.
Where is the Dutch entrepeneural spirit? It's like everyone wants to be depressed and feel sorry for themselves.
It's like half my country has forgotten that we beat the English by sailing straight up the Thames and sinking their flagships and the Spanish by sinking their gold.
We invented sea charts, stock trading, color TVs, CDs, SIM cards, Bluetooth and many other such things. A Dutch guy managed to bring Tetris into the world from behind the Iron Courtain. We were only third to the Americans and Brits to use the internet. Currently we are the only country equipped to build the machines that are used to make Nvidia Blackwell GPUs. We have the smallest landmass but are one of the biggest producers of food. We have the best F1 race driver and some of the best EDM DJs. There is Dutch directors, cinematographers and actors that made it big in Hollywood. Most of our country is entirely created by man. It never existed, we claimed the land from the sea.
Absolutely incredible.
We don't need climate accords and regulations. We need cheap oil, nuclear power plants, innovation, economic growth and friendly relations with our American, British and Canadian allies who saved our butt bigly. All the leftards kept complaining about that dumb war in Gaza and guess who solved it? Donald John Trump. Do they thank him or show their support? No.
Fuck the people with no vision that want to hold back greatness, ignore the media and join us to Make Europe and The Netherlands Great Again.
1 user liked this post: Potato
(01-21-2025, 06:27 PM)benji wrote: (01-21-2025, 05:51 PM)MMaRsu wrote: Which nonsense? Why were they at a presidential inauguration? (01-21-2025, 06:15 PM)MMaRsu wrote: Were they at Bidens inauguration as well? Or Barack's? Biden's inauguration was tiny because of COVID. Did Obama bother to invite Zuck in 2012? That would have been the only one he might have because Twitter was tiny and TikTok didn't exist yet.
Inviting rich dudes to public events does not make anything "state-run" and it's absurd to believe that's the case. It's especially absurd because "state-run" social media would not be able to ban anyone so the American state is not going to try and run them for this very reason. That's why the Biden Admin just leaned on Facebook and Twitter to ban people for questioning COVID policies rather than try to run the things.
Another way it's absurd is that you cannot even explain to me what you think this means. What would "state-run" Instagram or Twitter even look like? You think Zuck and Elon are going to destroy their ad revenue and the platforms themselves by banning any criticism of the American government? Come on. Elon himself spends practically everyday bitching about the government.
like this?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g32yxpdz0o
(01-21-2025, 08:15 PM)MMaRsu wrote: like this?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g32yxpdz0o Quote:Meta has insisted that is not the case, saying it is a technical problem which has also affected other hashtags, including a Republican one.
(01-21-2025, 08:23 PM)benji wrote: (01-21-2025, 08:15 PM)MMaRsu wrote: like this?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g32yxpdz0o Quote:Meta has insisted that is not the case, saying it is a technical problem which has also affected other hashtags, including a Republican one.
Listen I'm not saying that's what's happening, but it could happen, eventually.
I just found it strange the head of Tiktok etc are there.
But hey, there's more than one thing I find strange about Trump.
Meta can censor whatever they want on their platforms. That doesn't make it state-run.
01-21-2025, 09:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2025, 09:03 PM by MMaRsu.)
(01-21-2025, 08:57 PM)benji wrote: Meta can censor whatever they want on their platforms. That doesn't make it state-run.
I know Im just saying there's way to influence these platforms without having it specifically state run.
I assume
I dont know man Im just talking shit from my gut feelings man! Let me spout my nonsense
(01-21-2025, 09:02 PM)MMaRsu wrote: I know Im just saying there's way to influence these platforms without having it specifically state run.
I assume https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/weaponization-committee-exposes-biden-white-house-censorship-regime-new-report
1 user liked this post: MMaRsu
(01-21-2025, 09:10 PM)benji wrote: (01-21-2025, 09:02 PM)MMaRsu wrote: I know Im just saying there's way to influence these platforms without having it specifically state run.
I assume https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/weaponization-committee-exposes-biden-white-house-censorship-regime-new-report
Exactly if that MF can do it why cant others?
I dont trust Biden either, he wasnt a good president, he was more like a elderly resident
|