Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)
(Today, 02:19 AM)Uncle wrote:
(Today, 02:15 AM)benji wrote: In my opinion bisexuals, homosexuals and heterosexuals alike should be aware of their health every month. ("Fuck asexuals." - Royalan)

[Image: tILU8Xg.png]
[Image: fq5pXsb.png]
4 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Uncle, books
Reply
(Today, 01:38 AM)benji wrote:
(Today, 01:34 AM)Jansen wrote: Well most of the people of gender on bsky threaten to unalive them every other day so ..
Man who can't feed himself daily explains why he is afraid of getting a pet:
[Image: IUNDvCC.png]

Disgusting behavior. What if the pet becomes sick? Is he going to create another GoFundMe? 

People aren't taking mental health issues seriously anymore thanks to idiots like Melody and Clickycall. It frustrates me more than it should
Reply
(Yesterday, 07:53 PM)Eric Cartman wrote: This post about being a former gamestop employee and the deleted tweet about his funko pop collection, means I'm gonna bust out the full gif instead of just using the emote

[Image: osDP6pc.gif]

just top notch character background work, my hats off to this seasons writers


3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, books
Reply
(Today, 02:06 AM)killamajig wrote: For every one of HIS suicide bait threads......

[Image: QnRQDAU.gif] 

Fuck HIM!

HE'S taking cash from donors that could othwise be spending it on a donation to an actual person or organization that would put it to better use than Uber Eats and fucking toys.

HE is a MAN with autogynephilia. Just read HIS socials. They are full of pictures I wouldn't dare to post top of page here. Or  posts of HIM getting arroused by HIS own MAN tits. WTF!

BTW, I'm actually friends with real lesbians, not the lipstick ones. Everyone of them think this autogynephilia madness has to stop. So excuse me for listening to them over dudes on here or MEN on resetera.

*her
2 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, killamajig
Reply
(Today, 02:20 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
(Today, 02:15 AM)benji wrote: In my opinion bisexuals, homosexuals and heterosexuals alike should be aware of their health every month. ("Fuck asexuals." - Royalan)

Asexuals claiming victim hood is still the funniest shit. You don't fuck, cool, who gives a shit. A lot of people who want to fuck don't fuck either.
And then Gays etc. can't even call out how ridiculous this is because that's declared as bigoted. That's also why the acronym has exploded into LGBTQIA2S+ because who are to say no. Are you a bigot or something?

Asexuals are just virgins and you'll never convince me otherwise.
3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, Bootsthecat, killamajig
Reply
(Today, 02:20 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
(Today, 02:15 AM)benji wrote: In my opinion bisexuals, homosexuals and heterosexuals alike should be aware of their health every month. ("Fuck asexuals." - Royalan)

Asexuals claiming victim hood is still the funniest shit. You don't fuck, cool, who gives a shit. A lot of people who want to fuck don't fuck either.
And then Gays etc. can't even call out how ridiculous this is because that's declared as bigoted. That's also why the acronym has exploded into LGBTQIA2S+ because who are to say no. Are you a bigot or something?

I think the asexual thing is "please be aware how hypersexualized everything is in the world, and how it squicks us, how it all yucks our yum (our yum being not seeing T&A), please stop sexualizing everything because there are those of us who don't like it Gloomy "

(Today, 02:37 AM)books wrote: Asexuals are just virgins and you'll never convince me otherwise.

they don't even know what they are, a bunch of them are like "oh yeah I masturbate constantly, I just don't want to rub bodies with another person"

Mindblown
Reply
This thread was updated and I found this nugget...

https://www.resetera.com/threads/three-men-mysteriously-found-dead-in-friends-backyard-two-days-after-kansas-city-chiefs-playoff-watch-party.809601/page-10#post-118738695

Neppythecoplover wrote:This isn't a universal human experience. I'm a teetotaler. I don't even drink, much less find myself in situations where I'm doing things like coke.

So if three bodies ended up in my backyard from OD'ing, I would be extremely confident in telling the truth to the authorities regarding my lack of involvement in their deaths, and I know my alibi and witness corroboration would be airtight. Hell, it would be likely that other family members would discover them first and call the police before they were missing for two days, since we actually do go out into our backyard and look out of the windows.

So sorry to say, but I'm relatively confident in how I'd react in that situation. And it wouldn't be like this dude.

Not only is she a forum cop, she's trusts the U.S. judicial system too. 

Is there one single person over there that isn't a full blown hypocrite? Do they give you a test before approval on Era to see if you can contradict yourself every day.
Reply
I think the funniest identity label of all is demisexuality. Which is having to know someone in some way before you're sexually attracted to them rather than just being attracted to them solely physically even though I think this is almost certainly impossible to measure and distinguish in any way that's not projection. I was just looking it up to make sure I was remembering the correct term for it and this is on the Wiki page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demisexuality#Common_misconceptions_and_sexual_activities wrote:A misconception is that demisexual individuals cannot engage in casual sex.[17] Demisexuality refers to how an individual experiences sexual attraction; it does not describe a choice or an action, but describes a feeling instead.[4][18] While it is common for demisexuals to not desire sex without feeling sexually attracted to the other person, this is not required to be considered demisexual. Many demisexuals may choose to engage in casual sex even without experiencing sexual attraction towards their sexual partner.[19]

Anyway, you cannot convince me this is not almost nearly everyone because nobody truly has "primary sexual attraction" defined this way:
Quote:Primary sexual attraction: sexual attraction towards people based on instantly available information (such as their appearance or smell). Primary sexual attraction is characterized as being experienced at first sight.
Secondary sexual attraction: sexual attraction towards people based on information that is not instantly available (such as personality, life experiences, talents, etc.); how much a person needs to know about the other and for how long they need to know about them before secondary sexual attraction develops varies from person to person.[15][5]

After secondary sexual attraction is developed, demisexuals are not only aroused by personality traits. They also may or may not experience arousal or desire based on the physical traits of the persons whom they have already experience secondary sexual attraction towards.[16]

All this identity shit is just coming up with overly rigid labels for the fact that people are individuals and individuals differ. They see everything in reverse and think individuals exist solely as a subset of groups. Entirely backwards. That's why it needs to be rejected rather than dishonestly treated as legitimate.

edit: To clarify, the reason I say it is impossible is because all kinds of choices a person makes informs you about them visually, clothing, styling, facial expressions, the way they hold themselves, etc. It's like constructing an overly autistic reading of humans in order to say everyone "normal" is purely reading the "primary" characteristics when they're not. It's eliminating all of known psychology to hypothesize about how everyone must do things in order to differentiate themselves that's entirely projection in the first place. You already know my objections about this on another similar topic.

If you see Sydney Sweeney and she makes a stink face while filthy like a homeless drug addict or you see Gal Gadot and she's murdering children this will affect your attraction but won't be "at first sight" because time is experienced linearly. They're trying to treat everything as if there's some kind of possible "pure information state" that's accessible when it's not. And then they're trying to impose this unrealistic model on everyone when the problem is that their model sucks not that it's correct.
Reply
it's because there are 8 billion people in the world and tweens get in an identity crisis because they realize they can't possibly be special and are desperate to invent something that affects only 0.01% of people that for some reason they think they can be proud of and flaunt and develop their whole personality around

"oh that's jean over there, she's the only boreigender person at our school (everyone tends to avoid her)"
Reply
(Yesterday, 09:29 PM)Besticus Maximus wrote: Trump is RUINING our Lolboard. Many such cases.

There's only one way to solve this.

Boredfrom and Uncle must jack each other off.
5 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, nachobro, Potato, BIONIC, benji
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/captain-america-brave-new-world-ot-follow-the-leader-open-spoilers.1106463/page-13#post-137011224

Zeo bumps his own thread because no one posted since Monday with....

Quote:I just played against someone named 'Cap 4 Is Good' in Marvel Snap.

Jeff, you are one of the most uneducated people when it comes to movies. I bet you don't even watch any of the classic films because they make your head hurt. I know if it's written without children in mind you stuggle. So, perhaps we should feel sympathy for you due to your cognitive difficulties. Is that why you harrass folx on twitter? Your brain aint too good?
Reply
(Today, 02:58 AM)benji wrote: I think the funniest identity label of all is demisexuality. Which is having to know someone in some way before you're sexually attracted to them rather than just being attracted to them solely physically even though I think this is almost certainly impossible to measure and distinguish in any way that's not projection. I was just looking it up to make sure I was remembering the correct term for it and this is on the Wiki page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demisexuality#Common_misconceptions_and_sexual_activities wrote:A misconception is that demisexual individuals cannot engage in casual sex.[17] Demisexuality refers to how an individual experiences sexual attraction; it does not describe a choice or an action, but describes a feeling instead.[4][18] While it is common for demisexuals to not desire sex without feeling sexually attracted to the other person, this is not required to be considered demisexual. Many demisexuals may choose to engage in casual sex even without experiencing sexual attraction towards their sexual partner.[19]

This is always the funniest shit and it seems to pop up with almost all of these sexuality descriptions where they explain that that it's actually super ignorant to assume that they meant what they just said.

I swear I heard some explanation about how asexuals can have casual sex all the time and this doesn't make them any less asexual
Reply
(Yesterday, 02:30 PM)Superstar wrote:
(Yesterday, 12:15 PM)Rendle wrote: The average American didn't even vote so I doubt they have empathy for wealthy stranger's cars.

There was 64% voter turnout in 2024. Aside from the point though. Random violence and vandalism is retarded enough that even reeetards are pushing back on it.

Those 64% are outliers. All the average joe wants is a cold beer, warm pussy, and someplace to take a shit with a door on it.
3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, DavidCroquet, Potato
Reply
[Image: H0OKtVt.png]

Jeff just lurking his own thread.
2 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, kaleidoscopium
Reply
(Today, 03:32 AM)killamajig wrote: Jeff just lurking his own thread.
Had time to delete his tweets after I posted them though. Feels bad, man
4 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, BIONIC, Alpacx, killamajig
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/words.1134282/

TissueBox wrote:Which one is your fav? ^^'

Gee, how did we miss this bangger of a thread?
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
Reply
Hi, Jeff.  uguu


EDIT:

Jeff, whats it like to have me talk all this shit while you are cucked, just sitting there reading this?

EDIT2:

Jeff, whats it feel like to not be a real man and just let me call you a bitch to your face? I know you must love it. I'll be your daddy now.

Jeff, I want you to get on your knees and beg for me to insult you more. You know you want it. 

You love it, you dirty boy!


EDIT3:

You are trying ban bait Zombie....
https://www.resetera.com/threads/chappell-roan-releases-new-song-the-giver.1134240/#post-137008545
Zombie wrote:This one gets a big ol' side eye from me.

ZeoMyBitch wrote:?


But Zombie is on to your game and doesn't reply. lol  Lose again, loser lol
3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, StandingOvation, Alpacx
Reply
(Today, 01:27 AM)books wrote: Why do Ree mods need to take breaks? Log in, click on s some poor fucker with a username you dont have discord sex with, ban them for *throw dart at board* reason, go on with your day collecting unemployment or disability; maybe yell at your mom.

Edit-* top of the page on mobile white house press secretary when college party days tittay pics eventually pop up.*

[Image: giphy.gif]
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
Reply
Solid SOAP wrote:Nintendo's Blue Ocean strategy really worked for them, didnt it?

Confused

If anything, the Switch era has been a pivot from what the blue ocean strategy was during Iwata. The casuals from the Wii generation are not the same audience as the Switch. 

https://www.resetera.com/threads/bloomberg-nintendo-switch-2-set-for-gaming’s-biggest-ever-launch-even-at-400-plus.1134207/
2 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, killamajig
Reply
I feel the only real Wii style casual success of the Switch era has been Ring Fit Adventure. Otherwise we are back to the Nintendo core franchises dominating their own ecosystem. Yeshrug
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/chappell-roan-releases-new-song-the-giver.1134240/#post-137012889
ZeoMyBitch wrote:This needs to stop.

Edit: Didn't see that the original post got warned. Carry on.

Glad to see you got back in that thread to put in more work.

Carry on.
3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, BIONIC, HaughtyFrank
Reply
It's so funny how they simultaneously believe they now live in the fourth Reich under Trump but at the same time are super concerned about not calling out any people who didn't vote for Kamala. You can't really have it both ways.
Reply
Mass Effect: The Genophage Was a Good Thing

Quote: User Banned (1 Month): Inflammatory rhetoric, supporting eugenics

I don't get how anyone can think curing the genophage is a good decision.

It's a purely emotional choice because, logically, it makes no sense. The genophage is only an issue for the Krogan because of their own culture and way of life. They're a species that is inherently aggressive, highly dangerous, and unwilling to change to ensure their survival. If they refuse to adapt, then as a species, they've brought this fate upon themselves.

Even Wrex, in the first game, acknowledges that the genophage isn't what truly destroyed the Krogan. He points out the same thing I do: his people care more about war than about building a stable society.

And that's without even mentioning their insane reproductive rate—giving birth in batches of hundreds—and their incredibly long lifespans. If just one Krogan has 1,000 babies, then those have 1,000 babies, and so on, their population would explode past a billion in no time.

If the genophage were cured, there would only be two possible outcomes: either mass starvation wipes out most of them, or they set out to conquer the galaxy. Even with Wrex leading them, his authority would always be challenged, and sooner or later, it would all spiral out of control.

Some might call me extreme, but a galaxy without Krogans wouldn't necessarily be worse off. And the same goes for the Batarians.

Rofl

https://www.resetera.com/threads/mass-effect-the-genophage-was-a-good-thing.1132521/#post-136932624
Reply
Wrex is my bro.  STFU
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
Reply
That's not eugenics. 

edit: I think the staff think genocide is eugenics because the Nazis did a heckin' genocide and the Nazis were also eugenicists.
5 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, Alpacx, Propagandhim, Uncle, Boredfrom
Reply
(Today, 03:39 AM)benji wrote:
(Today, 03:32 AM)killamajig wrote: Jeff just lurking his own thread.
Had time to delete his tweets after I posted them though. Feels bad, man
Reply
(Today, 05:09 AM)TylenolJones wrote: Mass Effect: The Genophage Was a Good Thing

Quote: User Banned (1 Month): Inflammatory rhetoric, supporting eugenics

I don't get how anyone can think curing the genophage is a good decision.

It's a purely emotional choice because, logically, it makes no sense. The genophage is only an issue for the Krogan because of their own culture and way of life. They're a species that is inherently aggressive, highly dangerous, and unwilling to change to ensure their survival. If they refuse to adapt, then as a species, they've brought this fate upon themselves.

Even Wrex, in the first game, acknowledges that the genophage isn't what truly destroyed the Krogan. He points out the same thing I do: his people care more about war than about building a stable society.

And that's without even mentioning their insane reproductive rate—giving birth in batches of hundreds—and their incredibly long lifespans. If just one Krogan has 1,000 babies, then those have 1,000 babies, and so on, their population would explode past a billion in no time.

If the genophage were cured, there would only be two possible outcomes: either mass starvation wipes out most of them, or they set out to conquer the galaxy. Even with Wrex leading them, his authority would always be challenged, and sooner or later, it would all spiral out of control.

Some might call me extreme, but a galaxy without Krogans wouldn't necessarily be worse off. And the same goes for the Batarians.

Rofl

https://www.resetera.com/threads/mass-effect-the-genophage-was-a-good-thing.1132521/#post-136932624

This is how Aussies talk about kangaroos.
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
Reply
Today on Bluesky, the brain trust discusses the need for violence to protect cops from oversight by elected representatives:
[Image: 4Hz9BNs.png]
[Image: 7BaX3ZV.png]

And as always, the solution is so obvious and simple:
[Image: g741lBY.png][Image: kVj5jNm.png][Image: XTqNXWy.png]
Spoiler: Revolutionary tribunals for everybody! (click to show)
[Image: v60dO3T.png][Image: W6g7cbU.png][Image: S8h12Gu.png][Image: 4qsu5YB.png][Image: 9MmyJ7x.png][Image: ZGIKO1n.png][Image: yyHcMvv.png][Image: bXVxkud.png]

Plus you'll only have to do it once:
[Image: McQD86x.png]

Also, FDR only needed another 12+ years in office:
[Image: ALEOkQV.png]
(And Lincoln wanted a less harsh Reconstruction than happened...)
Reply
(11 hours ago)Polident wrote: This is how Aussies talk about kangaroos.
Never Forget: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu_War Australiacry
4 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, BIONIC, Alpacx, Uncle
Reply
(Yesterday, 10:57 PM)killamajig wrote: "Stupid, hateful, arrogant, ignorant ________ destroying their country and hurting their citizens."

Using any other race or gender descriptor will result in a ban.

I kind of always wanted to set up another account just to copy/paste moderators' posts and change "white" to "black" just to see what they will ban me for...
3 users liked this post: Taco Bell Tower, Alpacx, killamajig
Reply


Forum Jump: