Quote:And I'd say it'd be met with cheers except the usuals are too stupid to even get when shit's trying to cater to them.
well yeah
you go too long making absolute fucking dogshit and you run the risk of losing people entirely, who won't even go to see when something is supposedly good again
02-17-2024, 03:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:00 PM by FEUER FREI..)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/constructive-community-discussion.270630/page-243?post=119302536#post-119302536
ClickyCunt', post: 119302536, member: 7351 wrote:The Sora thread is disgusting me. So many people are calling people rightly horrified "misery mongers" and comparing this to rock music and other shit like that. Garbage.
Press the LOGOUT button you dumb cunt. or don't read/open the thread. such a fucking baby as usual
16 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, LoverOfCycles, Chumbawumbafan69, Anti-Monitor, Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Hap Shaughnessy, Gameboy Nostalgia, Greatness Gone, Potato, Averon, benji, BIONIC, MJBarret, HaughtyFrank, kaleidoscopium
02-17-2024, 04:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:06 PM by Uncle.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/openai-unveils-sora-a-shockingly-realistic-video-generator.818091/post-119298780
Crossing Eden wrote:Before anyone especially the people who cheer the death of art on a regular basis starts celebrating let's like, use critical thinking skills and acknowledge the reasons why this is fucking awful. Starting with how it's a continuation of awful things already happening:
"my page is full of people who are making AI stuff and other people who are enjoying it...why do we think this is ok?? why...why...why are people not freaking out about this??"
I love how they think people don't pay to watch these shitty fucking hollywood superhero schlock movies because of the diversity.
Fucking Blue Beetle : What even fucking is that? A fucking beetle man? Fuck you.
niaobx wrote:me when photoshop is invented: this is fucked. we were never meant to have this much power. just end the humanity already
but also this motherfucker is totally banned
12 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, LoverOfCycles, Brolha, Chumbawumbafan69, Taco Bell Tower, Propagandhim, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Hap Shaughnessy, Gameboy Nostalgia, benji, MJBarret, kaleidoscopium
(02-17-2024, 04:07 PM)Propagandhim wrote: Fucking Blue Beetle : What even fucking is that? A fucking beetle man? Fuck you.
02-17-2024, 04:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:15 PM by Propagandhim.)
Wow, I hope he encounters a big bad guy, the big bad guy beats him down, the world loses faith in his abilities, he finds some source of confidence and power in friends or a reclaimed past and ends up saving everyone from the bad guy in the final scene. Blue fucking Beetle. Get AIDS you piece of shit.
RetardEra going full Luddite on any AI topic will never stop being funny to me. Excited to see who gets banned from that thread once nepenthe wakes up
https://www.resetera.com/threads/openai-unveils-sora-a-shockingly-realistic-video-generator.818091/post-119300100
Crossing Eden wrote:Voltaire wrote:You can criticise the use of copyrighted data if some has been used to train this model "If."
I don't care about copyright in this sense. I care about consent. Unless literally every single video used to train this model had the creators of it personally contact the people whose videos they took to train it to get consent then it is made is created from stolen data. Stealing doesn't stop and end at "Well, is this video of you on social media copyrighted? What about this artwork with your signature? 🤔 "
It's putting emphasis on legality, in a world where laws famously fail to keep up with technology. When using this thing in our skulls---> 🧠 <---- should bring grown adults to the conclusion that it has NOTHING to do with legality. My first thought when I see this shit isn't "Yay now I can finally make that film I wanted to make."
Mainly because I already made it.
It's "This will be used for awful purposes and highkey the methods used to train ALL of these models has been by stealing from people who thought it'd be cool to share things on the internet."
it's theorized that due to openai's partnership with microsoft, much of their footage came from onedrive and other services MS offers, so sorry, every idiot who sacrificed the rights to their data for convenience has already fully consented
We haven’t had one of these threads for at least 2 weeks
https://www.resetera.com/threads/my-future-father-in-law-believes-in-conspiracies-and-my-gf-is-heavily-influenced-by-him-thoughts.818079/
Sadly she’s not a Nazi but of course the cultists advice is he should immediately cut all ties with her.
Voltaire, replying to Crossing Eden wrote:I have no idea, and you don't either we have no information on the data gathering process for that model. It is conceivable that they just bought illimited access to stock footage data to train it.
And in the case the model was trained on stolen data whatever that means right now, it is important to not say shit that will make it easy to dismiss you as a complete luddite. The model doesn't regurgitate training data, it learns (sometimes concrete and sometimes very abtract) patterns and concepts from training data.
Edit: Also to be clear I'm not a tech bro, I'm a researcher. I'm not here to gaslight but to try to elevate debate on this subject above the usual basement level analysis of this field of research. I admit I have a vested interest though, I'm interested in having informed people debating a very real and very dangerous problem looming over democracies. Instead of the usual "lol we're doomed" or "that's theft because it's just copying the original data".
super banned for "attacking other members" or "arguing in bad faith"
Crossing Eden wrote:Voltaire wrote:It is important to note that the model has been trained on a 2D projection of a 3D environment. With enough data it can learn abstract concept of depth and occlusion, limited object permanence, etc ... But without actual knowledge of the third dimension, there wil probably always be cases where the illusion breaks when generating content like that. It obviously can't grasp actual depth as a concept because it is most likely not encoded in the original data, our brain can make educated inferences with regards to volume and depth in videos because of preexisting knowledge about the rules that govern the 3 spatial dimensions of our universe. The model doesn't have that luxury. Yet. You keep talking about the possibilities of it improving while not at all expressing any opinions about the consequences of said technology. Do you just not care? Can you just STOP infodumping about how it works, gaslighting about whether or not stolen data was involved, and just, express, an opinion, on the consequences? If you can write a paragraph's worth of sentences in this post I quoted you certainly must have the knowhow to express an opinion about why this is justifiable.
STOP TRYING TO EDUCATE!!
ENGAGE WITH ME IN THE SHRILL REGISTER I'VE ALREADY ESTABLISHED!! WE NEED MORE HYSTERIA, NOT LESS!!
14 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, LoverOfCycles, Anti-Monitor, Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Hap Shaughnessy, Gameboy Nostalgia, Greatness Gone, MJBarret, benji, BIONIC, Propagandhim, HaughtyFrank, kaleidoscopium
uh oh, an actual mod (who no one has ever heard of) is insufficiently horrified
crossing eden wrote:We saw in realtime over the course of a year a nepobaby use his wealth to turn THE best realtime information website into a conspiracy boomer filled hellhole of divorced dad conspiracy theories/racism/misogyny/transphobia/etc.
Did we?
(02-17-2024, 04:36 PM)kaleidoscopium wrote: crossing eden wrote:We saw in realtime over the course of a year a nepobaby use his wealth to turn THE best realtime information website into a conspiracy boomer filled hellhole of divorced dad conspiracy theories/racism/misogyny/transphobia/etc.
Did we?
Remember when they called Twitter a Nazi hellhole long before Musk was even eyeing it?
02-17-2024, 04:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:41 PM by Eric Cartman.)
(02-17-2024, 02:52 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Silk, an animated Spider-Man show, is said to restructure towards are more male skewing audience and RE is fucking losing it
https://www.resetera.com/threads/%E2%80%98silk-spider-society-writers-room-scrapped-by-amazon.817986/
Maybe I'm overly cynical, but the fact this is "One source said 'yadayadayada'" makes me think one shit writer got their self insert mary sue fanfic shitcanned and are mad salty about it
Their continued meltdown over Twitter still existing well into the musk era and outliving Threads/Bluesky has been great. Threads using anti trans anti sex work etc posts in advertising was also incredible
It’s honestly amazing that not one person on that site has the balls to call Eden out.
02-17-2024, 04:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:43 PM by Eric Cartman.)
(02-17-2024, 04:17 PM)Uncle wrote: Crossing Eden wrote:Voltaire wrote:You can criticise the use of copyrighted data if some has been used to train this model "If."
I don't care about copyright in this sense. I care about consent. Unless literally every single video used to train this model had the creators of it personally contact the people whose videos they took to train it to get consent then it is made is created from stolen data. Stealing doesn't stop and end at "Well, is this video of you on social media copyrighted? What about this artwork with your signature? 🤔 "
It's putting emphasis on legality, in a world where laws famously fail to keep up with technology. When using this thing in our skulls---> 🧠 <---- should bring grown adults to the conclusion that it has NOTHING to do with legality. My first thought when I see this shit isn't "Yay now I can finally make that film I wanted to make."
Mainly because I already made it.
It's "This will be used for awful purposes and highkey the methods used to train ALL of these models has been by stealing from people who thought it'd be cool to share things on the internet."
I 100% legit want to see what kind of film CrossingEden would make
mengy wrote:Firefly Season II here we come! 😁
Alavard wrote:There is such an incredible sadness in this idea. That you could take this incredible technology built on the backs of real creatives, just sucking up all the art that they can, and then turn around and use it to spit out nothing more than more episodes of a show you like.
"I want to consume more of this. I don't care if the artists and actors and crew and writers that were originally involved still are or any people at all are - I just want more"
And I don't mean this as a personal attack on you, so it's not relevant if you're being serious or not. It's just a really sad idea.
Enjoying content and wanting more of it!?
02-17-2024, 04:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2024, 04:46 PM by kaleidoscopium.)
Now locked by B-dumbs, too many mass reports via their discord mob
b dimbs wrote:There is probably a way to discuss the ramifications of an AI software like this, but the framing of this thread is not going to lead into that conversation. Thus this thread is locked.
Y’all skipped over the best Cunting Eden post:
Bentendo24, post: 119300421, member: 64022 wrote:Mods made the right choice to allow this. It's incredible
Crossing Eden, post: 119300586, member: 8191 wrote:What's your opinion on people including minors having nudes generated of themselves without their consent which has already been a consequence of this technology on multiple occasions including an instance where a girl committed suicide as a result of being a victim of that?
What "good outcome" of this justifies that happening? I need you to like, think more critically than "Wow cool future" and actually weigh in on EXACTLY why the consequences of this are "worth it."
"When did you stop beating your wife?"
14 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, LoverOfCycles, Brolha, Chumbawumbafan69, Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Hap Shaughnessy, Boredfrom, Gameboy Nostalgia, benji, Propagandhim, HaughtyFrank, Uncle, kaleidoscopium
(02-17-2024, 04:44 PM)kaleidoscopium wrote: mengy wrote:Firefly Season II here we come! 😁
Alavard wrote:There is such an incredible sadness in this idea. That you could take this incredible technology built on the backs of real creatives, just sucking up all the art that they can, and then turn around and use it to spit out nothing more than more episodes of a show you like.
"I want to consume more of this. I don't care if the artists and actors and crew and writers that were originally involved still are or any people at all are - I just want more"
And I don't mean this as a personal attack on you, so it's not relevant if you're being serious or not. It's just a really sad idea.
Enjoying content and wanting more of it!?
also era:
WOW SHIPPING AND FANFICS ARE SOOOOOOOOOOO COOOOOOOOOOL
was just going to say something like this but voltaire got there before me:
Voltaire wrote:Shake Appeal wrote:To be fair, AI must seem pretty cool if you've never actually given much thought to literally anything except your own whims. I can see why it would be a downer if people kept bringing up stuff like "our interdependent economy" or "social relations" or "standards of shared truth" or "ethics." Buncha pessimists. The problem is that we were probably always destined to get where we are. Science being what it is, incentives economic or otherwise being what they are. If it's not discovered through public and open research, it is (like we are witnessing now) through closed and private research. If not openly in the US, or the EU (which is the best world to live in unfortunately) then covertly in China. It has the unbearable stink of capitalist incentives all over it but it's because the rest of society is just too slow to respond to the lightning fast allocation of resources that capitalism enables (externalities be damned, which is a problem I agree). We should have had laws on the books 3 years ago to avoid the worst, but we don't. So unfortunately in my opinion the best case scenario now is to dominate the field in any way possible and openly declare to everyone and especially politicians, anything on the internet is untrustworthy now, fix it or burn.
how would era be reacting if all this had first been invented in china or russia?
"omg BAN THIS china! you have to make this illegal!"
sinophobia?
Lost in the mix last night but Royalan made a… seduction… thread
https://www.resetera.com/threads/era-its-saturday-you-want-to-be-seduced.818016/
And Kyuuji just tagged Uzzy
Dubs, you’re a fucking terrible GM and your site is a terrible forum. Realize that and find a new profession.
11 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, LoverOfCycles, Potato, Taco Bell Tower, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Gameboy Nostalgia, Averon, benji, BIONIC, Uncle, kaleidoscopium
"Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak."
It's amazing that crossing Eden doesn't get banned for hostility. Why is his relentless cuntery accepted?
clicky cal wrote:Oh yeah the minorities that get targeted with this totally deserve it...🙄 Doc Holliday wrote:Stupid question, why do minorities keep getting brought up in AI discussions? Was there an incident or just historical precedent? Asking as a minority who is more worried than usual because of the 2024 election
https://www.resetera.com/threads/ai-artificial-intelligence-ot-fine-ill-do-it-myself-chatgpt-make-me-a-better-tagline.710690/page-25?post=119304888#post-119304888
|