Yesterday, 04:27 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 04:35 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
Quote:Quote:Well this certainly surprised me. The chuds seem to have completely abandoned LotF now, and are instead looking towards... Expedition 33 to be the next game for "them".
As someone who pre-ordered this a while ago, I'm actually surprised they're even optimistic about Expedition 33 considering how many females make up the main cast and they're not really being sexualized like they usually would demand.
All white men and hot women, no black people in the main cast. And sadly with the below. That is literally all it takes for them to stan it.
Zero queerness I have seen so far, many straight relationships shown at the start scene, some past opposite gender loves mentioned throughout, some only opposite gender flirting later in the game. Seems its like Metaphor, a world where queer people just don't exist. (inb4 yes I know there is no romance really in this, and none in metaphor, doesn't stop many couples/families/opposite gender flirts/mentions etc small idle heteronormativity from being prevalent in both).
FF remake had plenty of queerness/couples on the periphery, it's not hard unless you are trying to avoid it imo.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/gamergate-2-0-chuds-furious-about-a-consulting-company-named-%E2%80%9Csweet-baby-inc%E2%80%9D-which-overviews-scripts-to-make-sure-nothing-offensive-was-written.823731/post-139040730
"Stupid fucking Chuds think Clair Obscure is not woke because it doesn't feature prominent gay relationships but also I'm really, really upset that this game doesn't feature prominent gay relationships"
Sounds like two sides of the same coin....
Also I like the admission that attractive women are now considered a conceit to the Chuds.
This doesn't look like food?
14 users liked this post: Garfield, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, NekoFever, benji, Keetongu, Nintex, D3RANG3D, MJBarret, Potato, BIONIC, Taco Bell Tower, DavidCroquet, Boredfrom, Propagandhim
My NVME is 750 gb
(Yesterday, 05:36 PM)Besticus Maximus wrote: My NVME is 750 gb  Now this is what equity looks like.
Yesterday, 06:24 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 06:28 PM by Alpacx.)
(Yesterday, 05:36 PM)Besticus Maximus wrote: My NVME is 750 gb 
I'm still on a 250GB SATA SSD
Edit:Holy shit lower end NVME drives got cheap. Brb, consuming some ethical capitalism.
11 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, StandingOvation, benji, Keetongu, Nintex, D3RANG3D, Mask, Potato, Besticus Maximus, Propagandhim, Taco Bell Tower
https://www.resetera.com/threads/uk-ehrc-publishes-interim-guidance-effectively-recommending-a-ban-for-trans-folk-from-any-gender-bathrooms-plus-other-fuckery.1174317/#post-139123374
sheeldz wrote:So, do they realise that a cisman can now just enter a women's bathroom can claim that he is a transman, aka AFAB? Like, you've just reversed the fucking societal rules we've been using for decades... But codified the ability to do it under law.
Fucking hell.
Yesterday, 07:05 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:09 PM by Propagandhim.)
(Yesterday, 06:52 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/uk-ehrc-publishes-interim-guidance-effectively-recommending-a-ban-for-trans-folk-from-any-gender-bathrooms-plus-other-fuckery.1174317/#post-139123374
sheeldz wrote:So, do they realise that a cisman can now just enter a women's bathroom can claim that he is a transman, aka AFAB? Like, you've just reversed the fucking societal rules we've been using for decades... But codified the ability to do it under law.
Fucking hell.
Yeah but the legal interpretation appears singularly focused on using biological sex as the determinant for access to single-sex spaces....so the primary effect is to prevent biological males from entering women-only areas and biological females from entering men-only areas, based purely on that biological classification. Aspects like sexual orientation or how one presents their gender or the way they look, whether they're adopting toxic masculine gender roles and looking masculine or reducing women down to dainty feminine looking women by presenting as that, whatever - the way you look becomes legally irrelevant for the purpose of accessing these specific spaces. The defining factor is biological sex alone. I don't remember all of these arguments and tension caused because women had issues with masculine-presenting butch looking lesbians using the bathroom. So a man putting on a wig doesn't get him any more access under the eyes of the law nor does it shield him any more from the consequences of it. Do these people want to run counter to societal progress and echo back to historical patterns where rights were limited based on superficial traits like the way you look? Yikes. Uh, Jim Crow? Super yikes.
Yesterday, 07:06 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:06 PM by MMaRsu.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/my-roommate-talks-to-himself-while-watching-tv.1174608/
Folks itt pretending OP is crazy and its totally normal to talk to your tv constantly
Quote:I'm sorry, but the way he talks to the characters on TV...sounds really wholesome. He seems a really chill guy.
(Yesterday, 03:16 PM)DavidCroquet wrote: yeah, the whole “in some cases, trans men can’t use the woman’s restroom” almost feels like malicious compliance??? like, if this is supposed to be government guidance, wouldn’t it behoove them to explain what those cases are in detail.
Because the end goal is to find a solution where discrimination is minimised, but also to enforce existing protections.
Its like when the fuckwads going on about 'plandemic' suddenly all contracted mystery medical conditions that legally they didn't need to disclose but that definitely prevented them from wearing a mask and being able to go wherever they want as the main character.
If the guidelines stated, fuck, I dunno, "Except where the person has a medical condition and there is no working elevator present on the premises" then suddenly everyone the legislation is targetting has self diagnosed anxiety and are demanding their legal right to go into the womens showers, and writing legal briefs on social media about this one weird trick that terf bitches hate.
We all know exactly who these guideline are aimed at.
Its using vague language, because its not trying to single out mtf and nb 'trans activists' because its not intended to add new goal posts in the retarded culture war.
But we all know this is specifically about male to female and male 'non binary' people fucking shit up for other people, and all the guidance is crystal clear if you mentally substitute 'trans-era types' when it tries to cover that legally trans women are not interchangeable with women, and also all the bullshit rules lawyering they will attempt to do to get round that.
Its also to protect people trying to have legally permitted exclusive spaces - if you want to run a speed dating night for lesbian singles, you've now got an out when Skrillex with a half haircut shows up asking where the lezzy bitches at, without getting dogged as a terf on social media - "I'm so sorry, Im such an ally, and you are such an obviously beautiful definitely a woman, but laws the law, sorry!"
Yesterday, 07:31 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:33 PM by Hap Shaughnessy.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/indiana-lt-gov-micah-beckwith-posts-video-defending-law-that-declared-slaves-three-fifths-of-a-person.1174497/#post-139117884
Moppeh wrote:What an insane thing to say. Clearly it didn't ensure equality. Though it was better than what the South wanted. The alternative would have been that the slave states would have had even more electoral college votes and more house seats. They wanted to treat slaves as equals only when it came to demographic data so they could strengthen their power in the federal government. That being said, praising it and saying it wasn't pro-discrimination is fucked up and disgusting.
Edit:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/indiana-lt-gov-micah-beckwith-posts-video-defending-law-that-declared-slaves-three-fifths-of-a-person.1174497/#post-139127295
Kernel wrote:Most people modify their beliefs based on what they see/experience in the world around them.
Conservatives try and modify the world to suit their beliefs.
Yesterday, 07:34 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:42 PM by Propagandhim.)
The law addresses safety concerns explicitly raised by women, not to antagonize or make people feel bad. You're not the main character of the world. It responds to a demand for protection rooted in feelings of insecurity based on reality. Why a tiny minority of people refuse to consider the broader impact of infringing upon the rights of the larger group who are vocalizing their need for safety, is beyond me. It originates from a place of protection, not malice. It exists because many women are expressing that they feel unsafe and need greater security - why does this mean nothing to them? Only 19% of trans women claim to be exclusively attracted to men. The reality is, women don't feel safe around biological men that have a high chance of being sexually aroused by them in their bathrooms, changing/locker rooms, battered womens' shelters, prisons, advocacy groups, transitional housing, college sororities, retreats, book clubs, the list is endless...to say nothing of the issues with their sports. Is this a narcissistic personality disorder or do they really not understand where women are coming from? Figure out how to present as the way you want without fucking over half of the planet, please. Nobody has to fight with you about whether or not you're a chick, nor do you have to engage in that fight either, live how you want but also consider the security issues that women are voicing. Both can be done at the same time - there's no easy solution to this. If you find it impossible to believe and feel like you're a woman while also being in male spaces, then maybe you don't actually truly believe it yourself?
(Yesterday, 07:06 PM)MMaRsu wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/my-roommate-talks-to-himself-while-watching-tv.1174608/
Folks itt pretending OP is crazy and its totally normal to talk to your tv constantly
Quote:I'm sorry, but the way he talks to the characters on TV...sounds really wholesome. He seems a really chill guy.
How's the announcer supposed to know they made a mistake if I don't tell them?
(Yesterday, 07:31 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/indiana-lt-gov-micah-beckwith-posts-video-defending-law-that-declared-slaves-three-fifths-of-a-person.1174497/#post-139117884
Moppeh wrote:What an insane thing to say. Clearly it didn't ensure equality. Though it was better than what the South wanted. The alternative would have been that the slave states would have had even more electoral college votes and more house seats. They wanted to treat slaves as equals only when it came to demographic data so they could strengthen their power in the federal government. That being said, praising it and saying it wasn't pro-discrimination is fucked up and disgusting.
Edit:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/indiana-lt-gov-micah-beckwith-posts-video-defending-law-that-declared-slaves-three-fifths-of-a-person.1174497/#post-139127295
Kernel wrote:Most people modify their beliefs based on what they see/experience in the world around them.
Conservatives try and modify the world to suit their beliefs. 
Self-awareness has been in the negatives for quite some time, apparently!
(Yesterday, 07:34 PM)Propagandhim wrote: The law addresses safety concerns explicitly raised by women, not to antagonize or make people feel bad. You're not the main character of the world. It responds to a demand for protection rooted in feelings of insecurity based on reality. Why a tiny minority of people refuse to consider the broader impact of infringing upon the rights of the larger group who are vocalizing their need for safety, is beyond me. It originates from a place of protection, not malice. It exists because many women are expressing that they feel unsafe and need greater security - why does this mean nothing to them? Only 19% of trans women claim to be exclusively attracted to men. The reality is, women don't feel safe around biological men that have a high chance of being sexually aroused by them in their bathrooms, changing/locker rooms, battered womens' shelters, prisons, advocacy groups, transitional housing, retreats, book clubs, the list is endless...to say nothing of the issues with their sports. Is this a narcissistic personality disorder or do they really not understand where women are coming from? Figure out how to present as the way you want without fucking over half of the planet, please.
Maybe they need to do a twitter poll on whether women feel safer going to a toilet with a transwoman or a bear
If I didn't talk to the TV I could never have proposed to my wife, Gardevoir
13 users liked this post: DavidCroquet, MMaRsu, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, D3RANG3D, StandingOvation, BIONIC, benji, Taco Bell Tower, Keetongu, Propagandhim, DJ Bedroom, Potato, nachobro
(Yesterday, 04:27 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Quote:Quote:Well this certainly surprised me. The chuds seem to have completely abandoned LotF now, and are instead looking towards... Expedition 33 to be the next game for "them".
As someone who pre-ordered this a while ago, I'm actually surprised they're even optimistic about Expedition 33 considering how many females make up the main cast and they're not really being sexualized like they usually would demand.
All white men and hot women, no black people in the main cast. And sadly with the below. That is literally all it takes for them to stan it.
Zero queerness I have seen so far, many straight relationships shown at the start scene, some past opposite gender loves mentioned throughout, some only opposite gender flirting later in the game. Seems its like Metaphor, a world where queer people just don't exist. (inb4 yes I know there is no romance really in this, and none in metaphor, doesn't stop many couples/families/opposite gender flirts/mentions etc small idle heteronormativity from being prevalent in both).
FF remake had plenty of queerness/couples on the periphery, it's not hard unless you are trying to avoid it imo. https://www.resetera.com/threads/gamergate-2-0-chuds-furious-about-a-consulting-company-named-%E2%80%9Csweet-baby-inc%E2%80%9D-which-overviews-scripts-to-make-sure-nothing-offensive-was-written.823731/post-139040730
"Stupid fucking Chuds think Clair Obscure is not woke because it doesn't feature prominent gay relationships but also I'm really, really upset that this game doesn't feature prominent gay relationships"
Sounds like two sides of the same coin....
Also I like the admission that attractive women are now considered a conceit to the Chuds.
Suddenly one of the CHUdS turned out against the game and is the best game ever again, even if they are complaining about a swimsuit chapter in the WomenLustThread.
Is all so stupid.
Yesterday, 08:26 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 08:28 PM by Propagandhim.)
Quote:All white men and hot women, no black people in the main cast. And sadly with the below. That is literally all it takes for them to stan it.
Not that I give one iota of a speck of a shit, but this is hilarious because it's the late 1800s in a facsimile of Paris and there are no explicitly German, English, Italian, Swiss, Spanish, or Belgians, or any other culturally and geographically proximal groups but the French in the game...but you guessed it, there are a plenty of black people splayed throughout the game.
Expedition 33 ain't gonna buy itself
12 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, MJBarret, Keetongu, Potato, JoeBoy101, BIONIC, benji, killamajig, Propagandhim, Swiftest, Taco Bell Tower, Boredfrom
Yesterday, 09:01 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 09:09 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
(Yesterday, 08:26 PM)Propagandhim wrote: Quote:All white men and hot women, no black people in the main cast. And sadly with the below. That is literally all it takes for them to stan it.
Not that I give one iota of a speck of a shit, but this is hilarious because it's the late 1800s in a facsimile of Paris and there are no explicitly German, English, Italian, Swiss, Spanish, or Belgians, or any other culturally and geographically proximal groups but the French in the game...but you guessed it, there are a plenty of black people splayed throughout the game. 
It's not unlike the body type thing where it's mostly done because everyone else does it. Like there's no problem when your french game doesn't feature any Hispanics or Arabs but God help you if you're the game without black people in it. i.e. Kingdom Come, FF 16
Edit: Just for the record, I'm not mad that this game has black people, just that it's funny what aspects are focused on and what not
11 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, MJBarret, Keetongu, Vertigo, Propagandhim, D3RANG3D, BIONIC, benji, Taco Bell Tower, Averon, Alpacx
This is so low effort. How are people so fucking dumb
(Yesterday, 09:01 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: (Yesterday, 08:26 PM)Propagandhim wrote: Quote:All white men and hot women, no black people in the main cast. And sadly with the below. That is literally all it takes for them to stan it.
Not that I give one iota of a speck of a shit, but this is hilarious because it's the late 1800s in a facsimile of Paris and there are no explicitly German, English, Italian, Swiss, Spanish, or Belgians, or any other culturally and geographically proximal groups but the French in the game...but you guessed it, there are a plenty of black people splayed throughout the game. 
It's not unlike the body type thing where it's mostly done because everyone else does it. Like there's no problem when your french game doesn't feature any Hispanics or Arabs but God help you if you're the game without black people in it. i.e. Kingdom Come
Didn't you know 1400s rural Bohemia was indistinguishable from modern day NYC? Only a bigoted chud would think otherwise
Damn pops pulled the router cord didnt he.
(Yesterday, 08:56 PM)Jansen wrote: ![[Image: Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/tTmJZLFY/Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg)
Expedition 33 ain't gonna buy itself
I don't know if I really want to know the lore but it's fucking impressive how this person has gotten so webbed by a creature with such looks and personality as Melody. Even if you're a the worst degenerate loser surely you've got better shit to spam and simp for than a fat and balding neet trannoid pushing 40.
Yesterday, 09:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 6 hours ago by Jansen.)
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) ![[Image: Screenshot-20250426-162514-Firefox.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/zh9rPp26/Screenshot-20250426-162514-Firefox.jpg)
Motherfuckers so lazy they can't poke a few buttons every hour or whatever
(Yesterday, 08:56 PM)Jansen wrote: ![[Image: Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/tTmJZLFY/Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg)
Expedition 33 ain't gonna buy itself
Wait what, her internet is having an outage so she needs donations for support? Emotional support for the internet being temporarily down? Huh?
(Yesterday, 09:25 PM)Swiftest wrote: (Yesterday, 08:56 PM)Jansen wrote: ![[Image: Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/tTmJZLFY/Screenshot-20250426-155112-Chrome.jpg)
Expedition 33 ain't gonna buy itself
I don't know if I really want to know the lore but it's fucking impressive how this person has gotten so webbed by a creature with such looks and personality as Melody. Even if you're a the worst degenerate loser surely you've got better shit to spam and simp for than a fat and balding neet trannoid pushing 40.
Pretty sure she is the same as Malds.
(Yesterday, 09:27 PM)Jansen wrote: Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) ![[Image: Screenshot-20250426-162514-Firefox.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/zh9rPp26/Screenshot-20250426-162514-Firefox.jpg)
Moyherfuckers so lazy they can't poke a few buttons every hour or whatever
"Stop treating my survival like it's optional" 🤣🤣
(Yesterday, 09:23 PM)almostheathen wrote: Damn pops pulled the router cord didnt he.
Speaking of...
|