Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[PogiJones]

That's true for nearly all content-neutral restrictions, almost by definition. Yet, content-neutral tests are considered less stringent than content-based tests. As an analogy, cities can implement curfews for city parks, even though nothing in the city park is illegal to see, participate in, etc. It's a content-neutral restriction that prevents you from doing otherwise-completely-legal things, such as playing football. Anyone is allowed to play football, but the city is allowed to say, "But not here at this time."

[benji]

Because the city owns that property.

[PogiJones]

1. It was an analogy to explain content-neutrality, and 2. Zoning restrictions have also been deemed content-neutral, despite the fact that the properties within the zones are not owned by the city.

[PogiJones]

I also find the social media is "unlike anything the world has ever seen before" point to be both false and unpersuasive. And in the case of a Court ruling irrelevant as never before has such a thing provided a basis for the suspension of rights outside of when the Court accepted false testimony regarding the communications spectrum. Doubly so because they won't be able to define "social media" differently from the Internet in general.

"suspension of rights" is a loaded term, which I'm sure you're aware, because the whole point of the constitutional analysis is to determine whether the rights are there, not whether to "suspend" them or not.

The fact is, when choosing a legal framework with which to analyze this law, you have to choose to 1. Use a content-neutral test, 2. Use a content-based test, 3. Use both to give an "even if" ruling (which wouldn't be holding, so you'd still have to pick the primary test), or 4. Create a new test for a new category if you think it doesn't fit those others. The novel nature of social media (which you dispute) is absolutely relevant to the analysis, since you have to CHOOSE an analysis to begin with. You think it's unpersuasive that it's novel, and that's fine, so you'd have to choose either 1, 2, or 3.

[PogiJones]

Uncle, look what happens when you don't let us talk about the sun 

[benji]

I forgot we have a thread for this type of thing.

[benji]

Uncle, look what happens when you don't let us talk about the sun 

[Uncle]

I would never claim anything is inevitable, I'm just saying what the precedent is with every lower court holding to it since. The Supreme Court can always override itself but the current makeup of the Court is more pro-rights than the one that made the decision. Scalia was the only one who dissented on the community standards matter, but Miller has been shot full of holes after the Roberts Court said crush videos weren't obscene. It'd be fairly shocking if the Court said any community in the country can control access to the Internet on the basis of legal content.

[Uncle]

Uncle, look what happens when you don't let us talk about the sun 

I just wanted to use the gif because there was literally no more perfect time to use it 

[Snoopy]

I don't know why the vegetables are using 1st person cam to discredit the Indy game. My heart sank the moment I saw Todd fucking Howard.

[benji]

Why's it gotta be Indiana Jones? It's 2024.

This is exactly what I feared about when the chuds won on Forspoken. Not only goes the game not star a woman of color, it's first person so there's no real representation during gameplay.

[Uncle]

anti-todd howard shit is just dumb internet memes

[benji]

LET 👏 LESLIE 👏 JONES 👏 BE 👏 INDIANA 👏 JONES 👏

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

The whole complaining about "the straights" thing really, really bothers me, when it comes from straight guys larping as women.

[kaleidoscopium]

The fact their go to whining about kids being banned from social media is “think of the queer trans kids!!” is a massive self report. Remember when they claimed to not be indoctrinating kids online? 

[benji]

The whole complaining about "the straights" thing really, really bothers me, when it comes from straight guys larping as women.

So you're saying lesbians are "straight guys" because they like women.

[Polident]

Being straight rules. Seeing attractive women makes you happy. Blessed.

[benji]

Being straight rules. Seeing attractive women makes you happy. Blessed.

This is why women are fleeing The Bire in droves.

[DocWager]

1705672196[/url]']

1705670785[/url]']
Being straight rules. Seeing attractive women makes you happy. Blessed.

This is why women are fleeing The Bire in droves.

Uh… Excuse me!?!?

[Snoopy]

Ree watches Modern Family. Instead of drooling over Sophia they spend their time worrying about incels.



They will never learn.


https://www.resetera.com/threads/watching-modern-family-for-the-first-time-and-manny-gives-off-big-incel-vibes-in-the-later-seasons-doesnt-he.807138/

[kaleidoscopium]

Or your child accessing, say, a LGBTQ website that might get you into trouble with the authorities (you may think that's extreme, but it's not, we're seeing worse already

[JoeBoy101]

Or your child accessing, say, a LGBTQ website that might get you into trouble with the authorities (you may think that's extreme, but it's not, we're seeing worse already

See, to that statement I’d likely say something transphobic. Like….

“Show me proof.”

[Uncle]

I'm just innocently trying to go those DIY HRT websites and buy the moonshine without my parents knowing, but these dang sites keep getting taken offline for promoting illegal activities and being against hosting TOS

removing access to these hormones is actively harming minors btw

[Eric Cartman]

BUT MAKE IT LAME!

[Not an Alt Account]

Let's be honest, any talented woman playing Indiana Jones would do a better job than what Harrison Ford did in the last 2 movies.

[Boredfrom]

1705648837[/url]']

1705639813[/url]']
I’m also not fan banning social media, but I feel some people really need a huge internet detox, probably most of the trans community.

I don't consider an age restriction a ban. Cigarettes aren't banned, driving isn't banned, porn isn't banned, alcohol isn't banned. Not in the common meaning of the word, anyway. A kid's first amendment rights aren't violated by saying, "Pornhub, you can't let minors in."

Yeah, bad word to use in this situation, was tired to think in another.

[Uncle]

Let's be honest, any talented woman playing Indiana Jones would do a better job than what Harrison Ford did in the last 2 movies.

yeah it just sucks that there are no talented women

[benji]

Or your child accessing, say, a LGBTQ website that might get you into trouble with the authorities (you may think that's extreme, but it's not, we're seeing worse already

Only because the British forced those laws on them under colonialism.

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

The whole complaining about "the straights" thing really, really bothers me, when it comes from straight guys larping as women.

So you're saying lesbians are "straight guys" because they like women.

[Uncle]

1705648837[/url]']

1705639813[/url]']
I’m also not fan banning social media, but I feel some people really need a huge internet detox, probably most of the trans community.

I don't consider an age restriction a ban. Cigarettes aren't banned, driving isn't banned, porn isn't banned, alcohol isn't banned. Not in the common meaning of the word, anyway. A kid's first amendment rights aren't violated by saying, "Pornhub, you can't let minors in."

Yeah, bad word to use in this situation, was tired to think in another.