06-02-2023, 07:24 PM
Important scholarly discussion in the constructive thread:
Hours Left, post: 106563066, member: 8551 wrote:Please add the men loving men Pride flag to the rotating Pride flag site logos. It’s a major omission. The Progressive Rainbow flag represents the entire LGBTQIA+ community, so it’s not meant to be a stand in for the flag representing male same sex attraction.
Here’s the mlm flag:
Kanhir, post: 106617000, member: 1952 wrote:I think there's a general lack of acceptance of this flag in the gay community, partially because most people don't know it exists (it was invented on Tumblr in 2019) and partially because the colour temperature has been dialled down so much on every stripe that it looks cold and minimalist, which is the exact opposite of the camp party stylings of gay men at pride events. It feels like it was designed by people who don't like gay men or pride, but are big fans of bathrooms and toothpaste.
Hours Left, post: 106617123, member: 8551 wrote:I love the colors. Blue is beautiful.
I don’t think it’s a lack of acceptance, it’s a lack of knowledge. Many people falsely assume that the rainbow flag is the default for queer men.
Anyway, we need it represented on ERA.
Kanhir, post: 106617972, member: 1952 wrote:Apologies to mods for derailing the community thread with flag litigation, I won't continue after this post.
I said nothing about the colours themselves; I was speaking to the temperature of the colours.
Green is my favourite colour, but not these minty shades that have had all warmth and saturation extracted from them. There's something oddly heteronormative about removing warmth from a flag that should represent men.
For the record, I also like blue, and the blue version in your avatar is really nice, but it's from an older version of the flag which has since been replaced with the version you linked, which leans more into indigo.
(I really like the blue version, especially the second stripe from the bottom, which doesn't have the desaturation issues I'm complaining about.)
This is not a false assumption, this is a description of the current reality. I'm 100% on board with introducing a flag to represent MLM specifically, but we can't just invent one and then immediately act like it's the default and an entire community is wrong for using the flag they've felt represented by for 40 years.
For the record, I'm just speaking to why it was probably omitted, which is that a) it's recent, and most of the community doesn't know about it, and b) its acceptance level is low among those that do, especially when compared to the rainbow.
I personally don't feel represented by the flag because I think it's a poor reflection of the community, and its introduction feels arbitrary and prescriptive, but I fully support adding it if people do feel represented by it.
Hours Left, post: 106618224, member: 8551 wrote:If you don’t feel represented by it, then don’t use it for yourself. It’s important to have it here because it’s not appropriate to have the Progress Rainbow flag be a stand-in for male same sex attraction. The Rainbow flag is for everyone, and that of course is evident by how it had been changed over the years to make it more inclusive. By that same standard, queer men deserve to have their own flag for specific representation, like the rest already featured on the site.
This isn’t the place to litigate the flag itself. If it changes in the future, then it should be be changed here too, as the Rainbow flag has in the past. As for now, it is the flag for mlm, and it needs to be featured here.
FliX, post: 106623996, member: 3168 wrote:To make one thing very clear. We didn't omit it out of spite or anything like that.
The powers that be are working on creating it and getting it added.
Hours Left, post: 106634265, member: 8551 wrote:Awesome, thank you. I didn’t think it was intentionally left out, just an oversight.