Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[malfoyking]

I need to finish Better Things  lol.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-grand-tour-final-episode-one-for-the-road.961032/#post-127543596

Nah, fuck Clarkson, fuck Top Gear, fuck this show, fuck all his other shows, fuck everyone who works with him

[Nintex]

fuck fuck fuck fuck off fuck fuck fuckity fuck off fuck off off fuck
There I said to the English TV man he can FUCK OFF now I can dillate and do drugs in my fur suit to blow off some steam. 

[Lonewulfeus]

1724352316[/url]']
They all died of the Monkeymox

That would imply they are having sex.  Ain’t no way.

[Cauliflower Of Love]

Does anyone know if the Google magic ai editor tags photos like photoshop does when using generative ai?

[Propagandhim]

Does anyone know if the Google magic ai editor tags photos like photoshop does when using generative ai?

It does not add metadata or tags that indicate ai

[clockwork5]

so can we imagine the circumstances that leads someone to be found guilty based on an AI photo

is the accused's lawyer so stupid as to not raise the possibility that it was AI? what camera produced the photo? is the image consistent with other images produced on that camera, same resolution, same forensics match to the type of images captured by it including things like minor lens scratches? does the accused not have an alibi? do they actually own the clothes that are made up in the photo? does the hairstyle actually match them, and the length it would've been at that time? were there no witnesses?

did the illegal event even happen? who was harmed, do they say they were harmed as depicted? is it worth it to them to risk literally lying in court and getting caught just to stick it to someone?

Just the fact that the defendant would KNOW it’s a fake or altered photo would give their attorney ample motivation to spend the time to prove it’s fake.  Which isn’t that hard especially when you know it’s a fake. 

They seriously think “And for exhibit A we have this single digital image from an unknown camera, taken by an unknown person, stored on an unkown drive and received by the plaintiff through unknown means.” is going to fly in court.

Like these are the first questions forensics is going to try to answer. 

Who took the photo?
What camera did they use?
Where was the photo stored?
How was the photo acquired by the plaintiff/defendant?

There is a reason you never see photoshopped pictures in court cases. This stuff is incredibly easy to sniff out.

[Uncle]

Does anyone know if the Google magic ai editor tags photos like photoshop does when using generative ai?

It does not add metadata or tags that indicate ai

depending on how paranoid you are, it's possible that there's an undetectable embedded watermark in the image itself that only google knows how to read, should it ever become relevant for law enforcement etc.

if you knew it was there it would defeat the purpose, because then you could do various things to the image to try to ruin it (cropping, rotating, re-saving at a different quality level, img2img in a different AI program)

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/08/29/1078620/google-deepmind-has-launched-a-watermarking-tool-for-ai-generated-images/

some reading

https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking

https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-watermarking-issues/

[Uncle]

so can we imagine the circumstances that leads someone to be found guilty based on an AI photo

is the accused's lawyer so stupid as to not raise the possibility that it was AI? what camera produced the photo? is the image consistent with other images produced on that camera, same resolution, same forensics match to the type of images captured by it including things like minor lens scratches? does the accused not have an alibi? do they actually own the clothes that are made up in the photo? does the hairstyle actually match them, and the length it would've been at that time? were there no witnesses?

did the illegal event even happen? who was harmed, do they say they were harmed as depicted? is it worth it to them to risk literally lying in court and getting caught just to stick it to someone?

Just the fact that the defendant would KNOW it’s a fake or altered photo would give their attorney ample motivation to spend the time to prove it’s fake.  Which isn’t that hard especially when you know it’s a fake. 

They seriously think “And for exhibit A we have this single digital image from an unknown camera, taken by an unknown person, stored on an unkown drive and received by the plaintiff through unknown means.” is going to fly in court.

Like these are the first questions forensics is going to try to answer. 

Who took the photo?
What camera did they use?
Where was the photo stored?
How was the photo acquired by the plaintiff/defendant?

There is a reason you never see photoshopped pictures in court cases. This stuff is incredibly easy to sniff out.

[Propagandhim]

what if Nthing Loud shopped all the shit for his dissertation.  what if he shopped all the poopoo?  Just pages upon pages of fraudulent doodoo pudding.  what then?  and what if the results were all derived from fake data generated by chatgpt.  fake peoples' fuckin buttholes.  Fake asses, not unlike Mia Malkova.  Droppin fake doodoo butter.  What is the end game?  I'll tell you what the end game is:  We got pocs, bipocs, and possibly even tripocs bearing the cross of this madness in court.  And  ain't nobody photoshopping the prison sentences.  I'm tired.

[Potato]

Since Resetera is so sympathetic to ongoing genocides, I wonder how many pages their thread about the Uyghur genocide is up to?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-08-23/china-uyghur-policies-xinjiang-atrocity-crime-report-finds/104242378

The Chinese government has imposed 4.4 million years of cumulative imprisonment on ethnic Uyghurs in its far-western Xinjiang region, a new report has found.

The report, titled Uyghur Race as the Enemy and published by the Yale Macmillan Center's Genocide Studies Program, finds high rates of incarceration are part of "racialised atrocity crimes" occurring in China against Muslim minorities.

It demands urgent action from governments to prevent genocide and ensure "the Uyghurs' ability to continue existing as a people".

---

In June 2019, a Xinjiang court sentenced Zahire Memet to 15 years' imprisonment for "wearing long clothes, covering her face, and wearing a hijab" between May 2010 and May 2015, against the advice of the village officials.

"In another case that we looked at, they said 'this person is financing terrorism' basically [because] they bought a ring for their son in Türkiye," Ms Asat said.

"In another case, they sent tuition fees to their kids who were studying overseas."

Having connections to Uyghurs abroad, including in Australia, has commonly been cited as a factor for being targeted by Chinese authorities for imprisonment.

---

The report's cumulative sentencing of 4.4 million years figure was based on available data about prosecutions, which showed the average prison sentence handed to Uyghurs in the region was 8.8 years.

Xinjiang legal authorities reported that between 2017 and 2021, a total of 540,826 individuals were prosecuted in the region.

"That makes China, especially the Uyghur region, basically the highest incarceration rate in the entire world," Ms Asat said.

---

Xinjiang authorities have since stopped publishing this court data, meaning these were in fact conservative figures, she said.

---

Earlier this year, Human Rights Watch reported that Chinese authorities had changed the names of some 630 villages, to remove cultural or religious references, in an effort to erase Uyghur culture.

Mosques across China have been demolished or altered, including the removal of minarets, as part of authorities' drive to "Sinicise Islam".

---

The UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery concluded in 2022 that forced labour among Uyghur, Kazakh and other ethnic minorities in sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing had occurred in Xinjiang.

What? No thread?

Since the plight of the Palestinian people is so close to the hearts of Resetera's activist set, I would have thought they would be more inclined to take up the cause of another group of oppressed Muslim brothers.

[TylenolJones]

They might just think it’s over cause the thread got unstickied. 

https://www.resetera.com/threads/our-gaming-hardware-is-linked-to-slave-labour-concentration-camps-and-genocide-heres-what-to-do-about-it.386693/

[Uncle]

what if Nthing Loud shopped all the shit for his dissertation.  what if he shopped all the poopoo?  Just pages upon pages of fraudulent doodoo pudding.  what then?  and what if the results were all derived from fake data generated by chatgpt.  fake peoples' fuckin buttholes.  Fake asses, not unlike Mia Malkova.  Droppin fake doodoo butter.  What is the end game?  I'll tell you what the end game is:  We got pocs, bipocs, and possibly even tripocs bearing the cross of this madness in court.  And  ain't nobody photoshopping the prison sentences.  I'm tired.

this actually happened and collectively lost us many years of alzheimer's research built on bad data, literally photoshopped brain scans

https://www.businessinsider.com/alzheimers-manipulated-data-wasted-research-science-investigation-ab56-2022-7

[Jansen]

https://x.com/BlueDaze692775?t=IoKfZE_Xy8caTbiMLBrAcQ&s=09

My God just look at their replies 😅

[Propagandhim]

We're gonna go back to our 1998, hell maybe even 1995 understanding of shit logs now.  We're so fucked.

[Cauliflower Of Love]

Does anyone know if the Google magic ai editor tags photos like photoshop does when using generative ai?

It does not add metadata or tags that indicate ai

depending on how paranoid you are, it's possible that there's an undetectable embedded watermark in the image itself that only google knows how to read, should it ever become relevant for law enforcement etc.

if you knew it was there it would defeat the purpose, because then you could do various things to the image to try to ruin it (cropping, rotating, re-saving at a different quality level, img2img in a different AI program)

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/08/29/1078620/google-deepmind-has-launched-a-watermarking-tool-for-ai-generated-images/

some reading

https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking

https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-watermarking-issues/

Thanks, haven't been keeping up with the googs. Figured they'd have something in place.

[Uncle]

We're gonna go back to our 1998, hell maybe even 1995 understanding of shit logs now.  We're so fucked.

for some reason this entered my mind as a continuum of hollywood filmic understanding of shit, so I'm thinking like marvel movie doodoo in HD with lens flares, all that getting invalidated, wiped out, and the last good dookie available to us is from some pauly shore movie

[Alpacx]

so can we imagine the circumstances that leads someone to be found guilty based on an AI photo

is the accused's lawyer so stupid as to not raise the possibility that it was AI? 

You've seen Noodlesoup's lawyer

[Jansen]

Quick reminder that the director and lead writer of this game, Daniel Vávra, is a gamergater and racist. Some of his shit is mentioned here, but you can easily find more of it on Google.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/kingdom-come-deliverance-2-gameplay-showcase-gamescom-2024.959268/page-2#post-127557798

[Ribosome]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/democrats-attacked-a-muslim-woman-for-protesting-bidens-speech-shes-a-harris-delegate.960561/page-2#post-127529097

You're still going to vote for Kamala, Jeff. This is all performative. 

Who's still getting US provided bombs dropped on them anyways that I should care about?

Hamas? Shitheads. 

Houthis? Shitheads. 

Russians? Shitheads. 

[Jansen]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/no-one%E2%80%99s-ready-for-this-ai-photo-manipulation-widely-available-in-smartphones.961404/page-2#post-127555749

Good lord. I couldn't tell the difference in any single one of those photos in the OP

Then you would have to be an absolute stupid, inbred, my-momma-is-my-sista and my pa-is-my-grandpa, moron not to be able to tell these are either AI images or photoshopped:

Image 1: Where are the water ripples from a helicopter that's crashed into a river??
Image 2: Who the hell draws up 2 fat lines of cocaine on a rug??
Image 3: There's a dead body and a crashed car, but no police cars or ambulances?
Image 4: Who stands and takes a picture of a bomb with smoke coming out of a bag and is about to go off?





I honestly think the reason why ResetEra is so afraid of AI photography is because, just like they fall for fake stories and tweets and always jump to conclusions without ever waiting 5 seconds for even one fact to slip out, they are the exact type of people who will fall for a fake image every single time: dumb, gullible, stupid and somehow getting through life with one retarded brain cell.

I pour all my cocaine onto the rug so that when I pass out drunk I'll wake up high af.

Also my cat likes it too

[benji]

a paranoid JFK, upon surviving his assassination attempt, is said to have “basically resurrected Nazi Germany”.

He sounds like a jerk.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-politics-ot-3-walzing-into-the-future.947364/page-319#post-127282008

I would love for there to be tons of legitimate parties with a variety of platforms. But I'm also a realist. She has no statistical chance of winning. Literal 0. So the other two choices are A)continuing to keep the country as an open democracy, or B)legitimately destroy it.

Statistics show she pulls votes from Dems every time. She's a spoiler, and when the genuine survival of our country can hinge on a 1% of votes, yeah I'd rather she fuck all the way off.

If the "genuine survival of our country" hinges on 1% of votes, if this shift will "legitimately destroy it", then it's far too late.

It is their choice.

It is not a smart choice...unless their choice is to throw away their vote.

A 3rd party candidate will never win the presidency, because this country has not fostered the conditions for that to ever happen. Nor have any of the major 3rd parties fostered a local presence to facilitate that eventual reality. The Greens, Libertarians, Working Families Party...in most regions go dormant until it's time to run for President. That will never win.

If the US, including 3rd parties, were at all interested in busting the US 2-party chokehold, then there's a lot of local, gritty, thankless hard work they could be doing.

They're not doing it.

This is what's so infuriating about their ignorance, it's so aggressive and chastising. Third parties HAVE to run for President because ballot status is determined by it. One of the many hurdles that the main two parties have established to prevent them from being viable.

   Really cool and epic that our elected officials are sleeping at the wheel here. It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion.

We need regulation on this shit NOW

ACAB forum: why aren't the cops making this illegal and arresting people for it already?

Brawly Likes to Brawl said:
it's absolutely horrifying because I'm certain that at some point somebody is going to get absolutely screwed in court because a convincing enough AI photo is used as evidence and wasn't debunked in time.

Neppy

And you know it's gonna be either a Black or queer person bearing the burden.

Name a single person convicted of anything based on a single photo.

You can't, because this isn't evidence of anything. This isn't remotely how courts work.

They're just so ignorant about everything, do zero thinking and totally proud of it.

Meanwhile, they actually want people convicted for such things without any defense possible. Literally had three threads celebrating the hypothetical possibility of Joanne being imprisoned in France and somehow losing all her assets over being wrong on the internet. They regularly demand police arrest people and bury them under the prison for a single comment.

[Snoopy]

Oh Lordy. Trans Ree have infiltrated the Taliban -

Taliban sacks hundreds of men because they can’t grow beards

Melody Shreds, the director of planning and legislation at the ministry, told a press conference in Kabul that “281 beardless officers were identified, confirmed and dismissed” from the country’s security services in the past 12 months.

“The hairstyles of 450 military mujahideen were corrected to comply with Sharia law,” he added. “And some who repeated the [hairstyle] violation were sent to military courts.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/08/21/taliban-sacks-hundreds-of-men-who-cannot-grow-beards/

[benji]

Prosecutor: "Thank you your honor. Ladies and gentleman of the jury, here's a picture of the defendant murdering Grimace. You must convict. Thank you."

Defense Attorney: "Ladies and gentlemen of-"

Judge: "BAILIFF GAG THAT MAN! How does the jury find?"

Foreman: "Seeing as the defendant appears to be queer, we find guilty and despite being pro-life we say the death penalty must be considered."

[Straight Edge]

Does this look photoshopped, bay-bee?

[benji]

Think just how stupid you have to be to believe that AI photos are going to start getting people convicted when you've never heard of this happening with photo manipulation ever in your life.

[Uncle]

Think just how stupid you have to be to believe that AI photos are going to start getting people convicted when you've never heard of this happening with photo manipulation ever in your life.

that just means it's working

[killamajig]

Someone help me, is this real?

[BananaBlast]

I'm a bit late but....

It is because of Naiad's post two days ago, where the gender-obsessed narcisist who malds daily over sexy female characters had called attention to the very existence of this website, that I signed up here. So great job Naiad, in calling attention to this website (because you couldn't stand the idea of someone criticizing your aggressive whining), you've got at least one other person to inquire more about not only your heaping loads of bullshit, but everyone else who's in your little gossip clique.

Anyhoo, I'm completely new here (hi all), so I don't know how or what this place is like. But I gotta say, when I heard that it's a site shitting on the absolute insanity that are ResetEra regulars and moderators, I just couldn't resist. I've been wanting to provide my own commentary for that shithole for a long time. I mean everyone knows ResetEra is insane, of course, but I've found that there's almost no real discussion towards the specifics. ResetEraInAction gets barely any traction whatsoever, and ReseteraTakes 2.0 closed up shop about two years ago.

So, nice to be here. I frequently lurk the "why women criticize thread" because it's just a massive pile of cringe. Nearly every single post on that thread is just massive amounts of cringe. Wouldn't even know where to begin.

[railGUN]

If AI cured all cancer, Resetera would be upset and complain that cancer research scientists were now out of jobs.