(07-07-2023, 10:44 PM)Cauliflower Of Love wrote: (07-07-2023, 07:01 PM)Jansen wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-are-black-women-excluded-from-romance.739569/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d429d/d429d7909e75957b19939bfd3435dbf1ed8e7579" alt="Popcorn Popcorn"
OP isn't wrong, our black queens are ignored.
Just look at how distraught himu is.
they never think about what they're actually saying, what it would mean to see the opposite of these characters
imagine a quiet, demure, shy Black tradwife character who wears pink dresses
isn't that incredibly problematic and erasure of the Black experience?
They're so bothered about Threads allegedly not allowing NSFW content on the platform. What they're not saying is by "NSFW content" they really mean all their creepy furry porn and hentai data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47d17/47d17bf6283b57a0b50546f2e2134077bfab8683" alt="lol lol" since there's plenty of pornstars on there already posting.
(07-07-2023, 11:24 PM)jooseloose wrote: They're so bothered about Threads allegedly not allowing NSFW content on the platform. What they're not saying is by "NSFW content" they really mean all their creepy furry porn and hentai since there's plenty of pornstars on there already posting.
from just a historical standpoint Threads is dead before it started if true, platforms rise and fall on porn
beta vs vhs, the death of tumblr...the whole reason twitter stays dominant is so these weirdos can advertise their fucked up drawings, and so their consumers have a never ending steady stream of it
07-08-2023, 02:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 02:11 AM by Hap Shaughnessy.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/welcome-new-members-introduce-yourself-here.119184/page-33#post-107989137
Deleted member 15170
User-requested account closure wrote:Jun 25, 2023
Hi everyone,
Thought I should join up and be part of the discussions instead of reading them.
11 users liked this post: LoverOfCycles, Brolha, BIONIC, Potato, jorma, Tucker's Law, Greatness Gone, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Propagandhim, benji, Taco Bell Tower
07-08-2023, 03:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 03:11 AM by benji.)
(07-07-2023, 07:51 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/skullgirls-2nd-encore-receives-art-update-allusions-to-hate-groups-sexualization-racial-violence-altered.735408/page-2#post-108126765
Quote: User banned (permanent): Dismissing concerns around the sexualization of underage characters and Nazi imagery Skullgirls had sexualized Nazi imagery?
Also, he wasn't dismissing concerns. He was opposing removing content from paid games. Stop advocating for the Heckler's Veto, especially when you make clear constantly you don't believe it either.
07-08-2023, 03:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 03:17 AM by benji.)
(07-07-2023, 02:32 PM)Boredfrom wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/senator-chris-murphy-floats-selling-people-out-for-economic-unity-lol.739392/ Thread is hilarious, three pages of people posting about how they'd rather be (literally) exterminated than compromise to achieve any goals. With some even advocating for losing even more so as to never have to compromise.
07-08-2023, 03:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 03:25 AM by MJBarret.
Edit Reason: top of page
)
Bad things are only bad when our enemies do them. When we do them they're fucking great actually!
Edit
13 users liked this post: JoeBoy101, Brolha, AldusMoneyPenny, Potato, jorma, Nintex, YuYu, Tucker's Law, The Actual Ldcommando, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower, Red Cyclone, Straight Edge
07-08-2023, 03:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 03:28 AM by benji.)
(07-08-2023, 03:16 AM)MJBarret wrote: Bad things are only bad when our enemies do them. When we do them they're fucking great actually! In the words of one of the 21st Century's greatest thinkers: no bad tactics, only bad targets.
"believe" is in quotes because MovieBob only THINKS science not BELIEVES superstition.
(07-07-2023, 07:59 AM)books wrote: Definitely an average activist swinging their dick on the internet for a dozen likes at most. I can get a dozen likes just by swinging my dick around?
14 users liked this post: Gameboy Nostalgia, LoverOfCycles, Uncle, Potato, jorma, Nintex, YuYu, Tucker's Law, Greatness Gone, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower, Propagandhim, Switters, benji
07-08-2023, 03:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 04:03 AM by benji.)
Speaking of BELIEVING instead of THINKING, there's something very religious about all these people who post constantly on a platform complaining about how they hate the platform. It's like they think there's some Twitter or Threads god (Elon or Zuck) who reads everything and since they keep complaining that god will change sitewide policies for everyone and permanently. The number of people who have made bitching about Elon's Twitter every day on Twitter their entire personality is astounding.
See also the passive aggressive complaint style on ResetERA.com even as the staff constantly tell people to submit their requests in a hidden ignorable form.
edit: Can't forget the regular repeated "threats" to deprive the platform of their presence if things don't change.
I mean, there is people at RE that genuinely believe that they are changing the world by bitching at Elon Musk in Twitter or getting a Meta Threads account even if they hate social media.
I think you mean Elon Muskrat. Got em.
Today in Trans Joy with Corinne:
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) I'll probably stop checking on her this weekend, I'm really not joking when I say they all post the same stuff all day every day.
Cis people don’t even think about being cis, so how could we be miserable about it?
07-08-2023, 06:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 06:10 AM by Hap Shaughnessy.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/metas-twitter-competitor-called-threads-up-launched-7-5-23-7pm-et.737511/page-103#post-108647157
B-Dubs
General Manager wrote:This is the thing and it's across the board: they don't care what gets you to engage so long as it gets you to stay on the platform and engage. It's why Twitter, Tiktok, Facebook, and Instagram have the sorts of algorithms they do. The idea is they feed you not only exactly what you want to see but also the sort of content that will draw you into pointless arguments with random dudes in the replies. That's how they make their money, keeping you on the platform however they can for as long as they can.
(06-28-2023, 03:36 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/welcome-new-members-introduce-yourself-here.119184/page-32#post-107230734
Deleted member 14933
User-requested account closure wrote:Jun 12, 2023
Hi everyone!
(07-08-2023, 02:11 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/welcome-new-members-introduce-yourself-here.119184/page-33#post-107989137
Deleted member 15170
User-requested account closure wrote:Jun 25, 2023
Hi everyone,
Thought I should join up and be part of the discussions instead of reading them.
07-08-2023, 06:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 06:17 AM by benji.)
Yeah, what people want is a site that feeds them stuff they don't want to see. Like when YouTube sends them chuds. Do these idiots even listen to themselves?
I need to engage with social media for my basic survival in this unceasing societal conflict, it's those other people without self-control that I'm worried about being corrupted by the algorithms forcing them to stay on the site against their will. OH MY GOD DID YOU SEE WHAT THIS VOICE ACTOR JUST LIKED?!? THE CRUELTY IS THE POINT!
(07-08-2023, 03:16 AM)MJBarret wrote: Bad things are only bad when our enemies do them. When we do them they're fucking great actually!
Edit
![[Image: 20230615-012023.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/WDnx5z6/20230615-012023.jpg)
07-08-2023, 10:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 10:24 AM by Besticus Maximus.)
'What did you do last night Bob?'
'Usual really, sent a few hundred tweets that were basically moral dictats about strangers' behaviour and opinions for trivial things'
'Sounds busy mate'
'Yeah never stops!'
07-08-2023, 11:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 11:35 AM by killamajig.)
(07-08-2023, 10:25 AM)Cauliflower Of Love wrote: those hips are too big.
She got AI lookin thumb on her right hand.
Edit: left hand, image is flipped
15 users liked this post: Averon, Tucker's Law, Taco Bell Tower, Eric Cartman, Hap Shaughnessy, Propagandhim, Brolha, BisMarckie, MJBarret, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Uncle, BIONIC, YuYu, HaughtyFrank, Nintex
(07-08-2023, 05:46 AM)Greatness Gone wrote: Cis people don’t even think about being cis, so how could we be miserable about it?
all cis people are secretly trans, everyone wants to be the opposite gender and if only cissies would let their eggs get cracked everyone would be sooo euphoric sweetie
https://www.resetera.com/threads/yes-it-is-trans-genocide-a-faq-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-today.711593/page-4#post-108652029
Quillmonger, post: 108597012, member: 151749 wrote:I never knew about the biological woman thing being offensive, I honestly thought that was how it was said. I did use cis at times too, but I imagine that is why you-know-where just tried to make cis a slur, so that you're only able to use the right wing talking point version of what someone would say.
Android Sophia, post: 108652029, member: 156 wrote:It's offensive in multiple ways. For one, sex is more than just mere genetics. There are a large number of intersex conditions out there that defy the concept of "biological woman", ranging from the various forms of androgen insensitivity syndrome, to conditions like Klinefelter, that cause difference in physical characteristics. So the term "biological woman" basically excludes women (and anyone) with intersex conditions.
For another, the term is often used to downplay the study of gender as a whole. Transphobes use it to essentially reinforce the idea of "sex = gender", and in turn reinforce a traditional, often religious based, patriarchal view of society. It's a term designed to exclude trans women from a number of aspects of society, as well as ensure that cis women are considered second class citizens relative to men.
Conversely, despite what you might see from transphobes and bigots, "cis" is not a slur. It's existed as a Latin term for many years (with "trans" and "ultra" being antonyms) and for something to be a slur it has to be used in a derogatory, pejorative manner. "Cisgender" is just a descriptor of those who are not transgender.
07-08-2023, 02:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2023, 02:10 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
Quote:It's offensive in multiple ways. For one, sex is more than just mere genetics. There are a large number of intersex conditions out there that defy the concept of "biological woman", ranging from the various forms of androgen insensitivity syndrome, to conditions like Klinefelter, that cause difference in physical characteristics. So the term "biological woman" basically excludes women (and anyone) with intersex conditions.
Well they're not talking about those people then? Why should the term 'biological women' include intersex people? (Not to mention that intersex people are incredibly miniscule and it always feels like they're just used as a semantic excuse than people who are actually part of any movement)
Quote:For another, the term is often used to downplay the study of gender as a whole. Transphobes use it to essentially reinforce the idea of "sex = gender", and in turn reinforce a traditional, often religious based, patriarchal view of society. It's a term designed to exclude trans women from a number of aspects of society, as well as ensure that cis women are considered second class citizens relative to men.
Are we now back to separating sex and gender again? No too long ago RE got really mad at a school book that claimed sex and gender are different.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/uks-major-teachers-union-magazine-gives-glowing-recommendation-to-a-transphobic-hate-book-for-children-update-union-removed-the-review.634373/
Quote:Conversely, despite what you might see from transphobes and bigots, "cis" is not a slur. It's existed as a Latin term for many years (with "trans" and "ultra" being antonyms) and for something to be a slur it has to be used in a derogatory, pejorative manner. "Cisgender" is just a descriptor of those who are not transgender.
Considering that people are trying to make "cissupremacy" happening you're on a good path to make it a slur
|